Skip to content

Concerning definition for running_loss #8

@phucdoitoan

Description

@phucdoitoan

It is not an issue. I just want to ask why do you use running_loss = running_loss*0.9 + loss.item()*0.1 for monitoring the loss during training?
Do you have any special reason for this?
Isnt it conventional to monitor the average loss after each epoch (in this case, after each iteration)?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions