Skip to content

MIT and (L)GPL license compliance junk #283

@dodexahedron

Description

@dodexahedron

First of all, THANK YOU FOR THIS TOOL! Now that wimwitch is defunct, this is definitely the best I've been able to find that is open source. Many kudos to everyone.

But just wanted to point out that, because the 7zip library is being distributed in binary form, compliance with the LGPL requires more than just including the license text file.

Most importantly is providing information on how to acquire the source that was used for the distributed binary.

LGPL is an extension of and partial exemption to the corresponding GPL version. LGPL 3 specifically exempts only section 3 of the GPL version 3, on condition of complying with all terms of section 4 of the LGPL. The rest of the regular GPL still applies, however.

The short and sweet version is that distributing 7-zip in binary form requires either providing the source used to build it and instructions for building it OR (much more preferably, I'm sure) providing a link to where it was acquired from that complies with the same, as laid out in section 6, paragraph d of the GPL.

So I think linking to wherever you got it from would be sufficient. All the better if it was directly from 7-zip.org. If it was, here's the link to their downloads page for your convenience: https://7-zip.org/download.html

But it has to accompany the releases, specifically - not just the link to 7-zip.org that is in the README.md in the repo.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions