Skip to content

For drmm model, dense_output should be flipped at dim=-1?  #144

@wangcongcong123

Description

@wangcongcong123

Hi,

In drmm model,

Should it be
x = torch.einsum('bl,bl->b', torch.flip(dense_output,(-1,)), attention_probs)

Instead of
x = torch.einsum('bl,bl->b', dense_output, attention_probs)

After I revise this, I got the training loss reduction much faster than this as in
https://github.com/NTMC-Community/MatchZoo-py/blob/master/tutorials/ranking/drmm.ipynb

Below are my training logs:

Epoch 1/10: 100%|██████████| 319/319 [02:36<00:00, 6.02it/s, loss=2.167][Iter-319 Loss-2.134]:
Validation: normalized_discounted_cumulative_gain@3(0.0): 0.5825 - normalized_discounted_cumulative_gain@5(0.0): 0.6421 - mean_average_precision(0.0): 0.6019
Epoch 1/10: 100%|██████████| 319/319 [02:44<00:00, 1.93it/s, loss=2.167]
Epoch 2/10: 100%|█████████▉| 318/319 [01:11<00:00, 6.27it/s, loss=1.729][Iter-638 Loss-1.776]:
Epoch 2/10: 100%|██████████| 319/319 [01:19<00:00, 4.02it/s, loss=0.877]
0%| | 0/319 [00:00<?, ?it/s] Validation: normalized_discounted_cumulative_gain@3(0.0): 0.5726 - normalized_discounted_cumulative_gain@5(0.0): 0.6363 - mean_average_precision(0.0): 0.589

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    bugSomething isn't working

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions