Skip to content

Conversation

@kshyatt
Copy link
Member

@kshyatt kshyatt commented Dec 1, 2025

Decided to try doing these as separate algos for each backend, as I think AMDGPU.jl does not support sortperm yet (but CUDA.jl does).

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 1, 2025

Your PR no longer requires formatting changes. Thank you for your contribution!

Copy link
Member

@lkdvos lkdvos left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I might be missing something obvious, but there doesn't seem to be any specific specializations for the different diagonal algorithm types. Does that mean we can simply take the other changes as small fixes and use DiagonalAlgorithm for all of them?

@kshyatt
Copy link
Member Author

kshyatt commented Dec 2, 2025

Yeah, I did it this way for now to see if we did need them specialized, but seems not. (Thus, WIP.) I'll update the PR.

@kshyatt kshyatt force-pushed the ksh/gpudiag branch 6 times, most recently from 607be21 to eff9275 Compare December 2, 2025 11:14
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 2, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

Files with missing lines Coverage Δ
src/implementations/svd.jl 92.28% <100.00%> (+0.10%) ⬆️
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@kshyatt kshyatt marked this pull request as ready for review December 2, 2025 13:54
@kshyatt kshyatt enabled auto-merge (squash) December 2, 2025 13:54
@lkdvos lkdvos changed the title [WIP] Implement DiagonalAlgorithms for the GPU Implement DiagonalAlgorithms for the GPU Dec 2, 2025
@kshyatt kshyatt merged commit e72dca4 into main Dec 2, 2025
11 checks passed
@kshyatt kshyatt deleted the ksh/gpudiag branch December 2, 2025 14:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants