int-intervals (and maybe others)

[mwweissmann]

would you accept a patch to make the point-type flexible? So instead of forcing you to use a float, you could use an int (or something else).
Probably the most straight forward implementation would be to make the current lib a functor -- and providing a float and an int applied one.

[UnixJunkie]

Sure. Send the patch and I will review it. Thanks!
----- mwweissmann notifications@github.com a �crit�:

would you accept a patch to make the point-type flexible? So instead of forcing you to use a float, you could use an int (or something else).
Probably the most straight forward implementation would be to make the current lib a functor -- and providing a float and an int applied one.

You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#5

[UnixJunkie]

Is the module parameter your are thinking about just a type and a comparison function ?

[mwweissmann]

I think a type, comparison and bisect function, yes.

[UnixJunkie]

Concerning ints, I guess that most ints can be stored inside a float.
So, your use case is probably already supported.
Unless you are dealing with very large integers?