Replies: 2 comments
-
|
Related discussion https://github.com/orgs/agentclientprotocol/discussions/80 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
HI @xxchan we obviously started with the focus on coding editors and coding agents, but this is very quickly moving beyond this use case. We could definitely revisit some of the focus of the phrasing, but know that we don't intend to limit this, we just had to start somewhere |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
From the name, ACP seems to be a general thing.
But from the docs, it seems to be targeted to "Editors", e.g.,
https://agentclientprotocol.com/overview/introduction
Editors on ACP

But we can find there are at least a few "non-editor" thing, e.g., DeepChat, aizen
Although I totally understand that as the original creator of ACP, Zed wants best editor integration. But as an open protocol, the positioning might be a little confusing. So I'd like to seek for some clarification or discussion here.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions