Skip to content
This repository was archived by the owner on Jan 31, 2022. It is now read-only.
This repository was archived by the owner on Jan 31, 2022. It is now read-only.

searchDisjunctiveFaceting's response does not follow the specs #485

@PLNech

Description

@PLNech

A customer on support reported that ISA's addFacetRefinement used with isDisjunctiveFacet=true does return hits with only the selected facet values.

He's mostly right: the documented parameter facets is returned with the currently refined facets, while the disjunctive facet values are returned in the undocumented disjunctiveFacets parameters.

Compare with IS-iOS using the swift client, which follows the specification:
facets contain disjunctive values

I see two potential solutions:

  • If we consider that having both attributes brings value (and I believe so), we should open the conversation with the other API client maintainers to return both results for disjunctive faceting queries
  • If we consider this is useless, we should update the client to put disjunctive facets in facets (keeping the disjunctiveFacets attribute for BC until the next major version).

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions