Skip to content

AWS ‐ ECS vs EKS

Jump to bottom
Full Stack edited this page Aug 19, 2025 · 5 revisions

ECS VS EKS

ECS (Elastic Container Service)

The deployment setup for ECS typically revolves around Task Definitions, Services, and potentially leveraging AWS Fargate for serverless container execution.

Steps:

  1. Containerize Your Application

    • Package your application code and dependencies into a Docker image.

  2. Push Image to ECR

  3. Create an ECS Cluster

    • Logical grouping of resources (EC2 instances or Fargate tasks) where your containers run.
    • Create via AWS Console, CLI, or IaC tools like CloudFormation or Terraform.

  4. Define a Task Definition

    • A JSON file describing:
      • Docker image to use
      • CPU & memory allocation
      • Networking configuration
      • IAM permissions

  5. Create a Service

    • Ensures a specified number of tasks (instances of your task definition) are running.
    • Handles scaling, rolling updates, and high availability.

  6. Configure Load Balancing

    • Integrate with Application Load Balancer (ALB) or Network Load Balancer (NLB).
    • Supports dynamic port mapping and path-based routing.

  7. Automate Deployments with CI/CD (Optional but Recommended)

    • Use AWS CodePipeline, Jenkins, or GitHub Actions.
    • Typical workflow:
      • Source Stage: Code changes committed to GitHub/AWS CodeCommit.
      • Build Stage: AWS CodeBuild builds Docker image, pushes to ECR.
      • Deploy Stage: AWS CodeDeploy deploys the image to ECS, updating the task definition.
      • Testing & Rollbacks: Automated tests & rollback strategies can be configured.

EKS (Elastic Kubernetes Service)

Deploying applications on EKS involves interacting with Kubernetes through tools like kubectl and Helm.

Steps:

  1. Set Up an EKS Cluster

    • Create a cluster with worker nodes using eksctl or AWS Console.
    • Specify Kubernetes version, region, and instance types.

  2. Configure Service Mesh (Optional)

    • Use tools like Istio for microservice communication, traffic routing, encryption, and monitoring.

  3. Define Kubernetes Resources with Helm

    • Package/manage resources (Deployments, Services, Ingress) using reusable Helm charts.

  4. Manage Traffic with AWS Load Balancer & Ingress

    • AWS Load Balancer Controller connects Kubernetes Ingress with AWS ALB/NLB.

  5. Automate Deployments with CI/CD

    • Integrate Jenkins, GitLab, or AWS CodePipeline.
    • Example workflow:
      • Build Docker images, push to ECR/Docker Hub.
      • Update Helm charts & trigger deployments to EKS.

  6. EKS Blueprints (Recommended for Complex Environments)

  7. Secure Access to EKS Cluster

    • Use AWS IAM for authentication.
    • Configure aws-auth ConfigMap to map IAM roles to Kubernetes RBAC.
    • Use private endpoints to restrict control plane access (Anvesh Muppeda).

  8. Implement Logging & Monitoring

    • Integrate with AWS CloudWatch, Prometheus, Grafana for metrics, alerts, and centralized logging (AWS re:Post).

Key Takeaways for Both ECS & EKS:

  • Containerization is Fundamental: Package your apps as Docker images.
  • Infrastructure as Code (IaC): Use tools like Terraform or CloudFormation for consistent infrastructure management.
  • CI/CD Pipelines are Crucial: Automate deployments for efficiency and reduced risk.
  • Monitoring & Logging: Robust setups provide insights into app health and performance.

Note: Specific implementation details vary by application requirements, team expertise, and environment complexity.

Cost Analysis & Comparison: ECS vs. EKS

Understanding the cost implications of ECS and EKS requires analyzing various factors and running a simulated comparison to make an informed decision for your specific use case.

Cost Drivers for ECS and EKS

1. Compute Resources

  • EC2 Instances:
    Both ECS and EKS can use Amazon EC2 instances to run containers.

    • Costs depend on instance type (e.g., m5.large, t3.medium), size, and pricing model (on-demand, reserved, or Spot Instances).
    • Spot Instances offer significant cost savings for fault-tolerant workloads.

  • AWS Fargate:
    Serverless compute engine; you pay for vCPU and memory consumed by containers.

    • More cost-effective for irregular/bursty workloads.
    • For stable workloads, EC2 instances may be cheaper (nops.io).

2. Control Plane Costs

  • ECS:
    No additional charges for the control plane; pay only for provisioned resources (EC2 or Fargate).
  • EKS:
    Fixed fee of $0.10/hour ($74/month) per cluster, regardless of worker nodes/apps (CloudZero).

3. Networking

  • Data transfer between Availability Zones/regions can accumulate in multi-AZ EKS deployments (DevZero).
  • Use VPC Endpoints to connect privately to services like S3, reducing network costs.
  • Load balancer charges (ALB/NLB) apply to both ECS and EKS, varying by data processed and Load Balancer Capacity Units (LCUs).

4. Storage

  • EBS: Persistent storage; costs vary by volume size, type, and I/O.
  • EFS: Shared file systems.
  • S3: For large data storage (DevZero).

5. Other Costs

  • Monitoring/logging (AWS CloudWatch, Prometheus, Grafana).
  • Licensing for third-party tools/add-ons (CloudKeeper).
  • Operational overhead and required expertise.

Cost Comparison Simulation

Scenario:
Run 10 microservices, each requiring 1 vCPU and 2 GiB memory, average utilization 50%.

1. ECS Cost Breakdown (Fargate)

  • Compute:
    10 tasks × (1 vCPU × $0.04048/hr + 2 GiB × $0.004445/GiB-hr) × 730 hr/month
    = $346.74/month
    (Assuming on-demand Fargate pricing in us-east-1; check AWS pricing for latest rates)

  • Control Plane:
    $0 (no additional charges)

  • Total ECS Costs:
    $346.74/month

2. EKS Cost Breakdown

  • Control Plane:
    $0.10/hr × 730 hr/month = $73/month

  • Worker Nodes (EC2):
    Example: 2 t3.medium (2 vCPU, 4 GiB RAM) instances for redundancy/autoscaling
    2 × (2 vCPU × $0.0210/hr + 4 GiB × $0.0042/GiB-hr) × 730 hr/month
    = $111.49/month
    (on-demand pricing in us-east-1; check AWS pricing)

  • Worker Nodes (Fargate):
    Compute cost similar to ECS Fargate: $346.74/month

  • Total EKS (EC2) Costs:
    $73 (control plane) + $111.49 (EC2) = $184.49/month

  • Total EKS (Fargate) Costs:
    $73 (control plane) + $346.74 (Fargate) = $419.74/month

Simulation Conclusion

  • Most cost-effective: ECS on Fargate
  • Next: EKS on EC2 instances
  • Most expensive: EKS with Fargate (in this simulation)

Important Considerations & Optimization

  • Scalability:
    For unpredictable spikes, Fargate (ECS/EKS) may be preferable despite higher base costs as it avoids over-provisioning (CloudZero).

  • Utilization:
    Efficient EC2 utilization can be more cost-effective than Fargate for consistent, high-demand workloads.

  • Optimization:

    • Use autoscaling (Cluster Autoscaler, Horizontal Pod Autoscaler)
    • Right-size instances
    • Schedule non-critical workloads for off-peak hours
    • Leverage Spot Instances or Savings Plans (DevZero)

  • Operational Overhead:
    ECS may have lower direct costs; EKS may incur higher operational overhead due to Kubernetes complexity.

  • Vendor Lock-in vs. Open Source:
    EKS (Kubernetes) offers greater portability if avoiding vendor lock-in is a priority (Densify).

Clone this wiki locally