Additional EIP-7594 PeerDAS Tx Integration

[holgerd77]

General follow-up on #3976, direct follow-up on #4157
Implements #4156

This PR expands the 4844 constructor(s) and the serialization methods to integrate the 7594 network wrapper version. Additionally it adds new helpers to the Util blob helper module.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 68.42105% with 12 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 84.75%. Comparing base (a2878a6) to head (f1cb4fc).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

Flag	Coverage Δ
block	87.58% <ø> (ø)
blockchain	89.37% <ø> (ø)
common	97.43% <ø> (ø)
evm	72.39% <ø> (ø)
mpt	89.74% <ø> (ø)
statemanager	80.21% <ø> (ø)
static	99.77% <ø> (ø)
tx	88.23% <65.71%> (-0.44%)	⬇️
util	89.77% <100.00%> (+0.87%)	⬆️
vm	57.24% <ø> (+0.07%)	⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[holgerd77]

No review for a week, will take this in, post-merge review still appreciated.

Sepolia tx is working with this though:
https://sepolia.etherscan.io/tx/0x4a7cc4ab9b1b8174e9b65dabb18d5118cecbf224919be8030aef7b91998a6478

So this means that the network wrapper serialization method is correct. I am honestly not sure if this means/says anything about the cell proof being correct if the tx is accepted by the network? 🤔 Any insights here?

(actually I could try to send with modfied proofs and see what happens, might do that if some capacity)