Skip to content

eIDAS2 requirements for Payment Authorizations #603

@cyberphone

Description

@cyberphone

The EUDIW vendors who are building support for payment authorizations claim that eIDAS

  • Is a legal requirement
  • Adds value

The legal requirements are incorrect, proved by the fact that Apple, Wero, and 30+ other mobile payment providers are not being forced to adapt their systems to eIDAS2 (beyond SCA which most of them have had running from the day one).

How eIDAS2 adds value to a payment authorization process, lacks a description.

Note that for payment authorizations the Issuer=RP. Put in another way: a bank card is issued by the bank which also is the only party that can validate it. No TTP needed.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions