wizardly doesn't work with rails 3.0.0rc

[paulschreiber]

wizardly doesn't work with rails 3. there are a few issues:

• the generators don't work [you can work around this]
  * validation_group doesn't work

I'm not sure if there are problems in wizardly itself, because I'm blocked on validation_group. I tried hacking on that, and could get it to compile, but no luck.

Has anyone successfully ported this to rails 3?

[roja]

any update on this?

[manuelmeurer]

Just trying to get Wizardly working in a Rails 3 app and using jfelchner's fork, he cleaned up some Rails 3 related issues.

[mhuggins]

Thanks for the heads up about jfelchner's fork, manuelmeurer. Hopefully we find this merged into jeffp's branch at some point.

[shedd]

Any further updates on this?

[evolve2k]

updates?

[paulschreiber]

On Oct 31, 2011, at 3:29 AM, evolve2k
reply@reply.github.com
wrote:

updates?

I have no news. There's a fork that someone made for rails 3, but I
don't know how far along they got.

Paul

[elsurudo]

Still no updates? Hard to believe there isn't a decent wizarding gem that works with Rails 3!

[paulschreiber]

On Feb 22, 2012, at 11:09 AM, Ernest Surudo wrote:

Still no updates? Hard to believe there isn't a decent wizarding gem that works with Rails 3!

No updates. Our company is moving to Rails 3 next month, so were going to figure out/build something.

Paul

[elsurudo]

I've got immediate needs as well, so I've already started working on a solution. If it's any good, I'll be sure to pull it out into a gem and share when I have the time.

On 2012-02-23, at 20:37, Paul Schreiberreply@reply.github.com wrote:

On Feb 22, 2012, at 11:09 AM, Ernest Surudo wrote:

Still no updates? Hard to believe there isn't a decent wizarding gem that works with Rails 3!

No updates. Our company is moving to Rails 3 next month, so were going to figure out/build something.

Paul

---

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#15 (comment)

[paulschreiber]

On Feb 23, 2012, at 3:37 PM, Ernest Surudo wrote:

I've got immediate needs as well, so I've already started working on a solution. If it's any good, I'll be sure to pull it out into a gem and share when I have the time.

email me at paulschreiber@gmail.com — let’s talk about what you’re doing.

Paul

[manuelmeurer]

If you guys put a gem together, it would be great if you let us know in this thread! :) I built some wizards using the method Ryan Bates has shown in his Railscast about multi-step forms, but that is not the cleanest solution.

[elsurudo]

Yeah, I agree. I'm trying to keep my wizard logic in the controller, where it belongs. To me, it seems cleaner to have a separate action for each step.

I'm still really new to this, but will let you all know if something decent comes out of it!

On 2012-02-23, at 10:14 PM, Manuel Meurer wrote:

If you guys put a gem together, it would be great if you let us know in this thread! :) I built some wizards using the method Ryan Bates has shown in his Railscast about multi-step forms, but that is not the cleanest solution.

---

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#15 (comment)

[manuelmeurer]

Here's a new wizard gem: https://github.com/schneems/wicked
Blog post: http://schneems.com/post/18437886598/wizard-ify-your-rails-controllers-with-wicked

[elsurudo]

Thanks! Just found this one a couple of days ago myself. It's pretty well-written, but functionality is pretty basic. Overall, a good base to build something more complex on.

On 2012-03-08, at 4:51 PM, Manuel Meurer wrote:

Here's a new wizard gem: https://github.com/schneems/wicked
Blog post: http://schneems.com/post/18437886598/wizard-ify-your-rails-controllers-with-wicked

---

Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
#15 (comment)