Skip to content

Different batch sizes lead to different evalution results for LongVIT #107

@HHHedo

Description

@HHHedo

Hi,
Thanks for your great work.
When I use the LongVIT for survival prediction, I find that different batch sizes will lead to different C-index results.
After I print the risk for each person, I also find that some risks are different.
The followings are some examples

bs = 8 bs =1 bs =2
TCGA-06-0168 -1.2465172 TCGA-06-0168 -1.2457247 TCGA-06-0168 -1.2465172
TCGA-06-0645 -3.1927319 TCGA-06-0645 -3.193125 TCGA-06-0645 -3.1927319
TCGA-06-0646 -2.8353539 TCGA-06-0646 -2.8353539 TCGA-06-0646 -2.8353539
TCGA-06-0750 -0.9242315 TCGA-06-0750 -0.924083 TCGA-06-0750 -0.9242315
TCGA-06-5410 -1.7878933 TCGA-06-5410 -1.7888575 TCGA-06-5410 -1.7877667
TCGA-06-5411 -0.7950437 TCGA-06-5411 -0.7950437 TCGA-06-5411 -0.7950437
TCGA-06-5413 -0.8715491 TCGA-06-5413 -0.8715491 TCGA-06-5413 -0.87227124
TCGA-06-5856 -1.512358 TCGA-06-5856 -1.512358 TCGA-06-5856 -1.512358
TCGA-12-0618 -3.3228474 TCGA-12-0618 -3.3228474 TCGA-12-0618 -3.3228474
TCGA-12-0821 -3.0764904 TCGA-12-0821 -3.0764904 TCGA-12-0821 -3.0764904
TCGA-12-3653 -2.5728168 TCGA-12-3653 -2.5728168 TCGA-12-3653 -2.5728168
TCGA-19-2629 -2.5467625 TCGA-19-2629 -2.5467625 TCGA-19-2629 -2.5467625
TCGA-19-5960 -2.1180227 TCGA-19-5960 -2.1180227 TCGA-19-5960 -2.1180227
TCGA-26-1442 -1.2899182 TCGA-26-1442 -1.2899779 TCGA-26-1442 -1.2899182
TCGA-26-5133 -2.0898883 TCGA-26-5133 -2.0900764 TCGA-26-5133 -2.0894563
TCGA-27-1830 -1.2196785 TCGA-27-1830 -1.2196785 TCGA-27-1830 -1.2196785
TCGA-27-1831 -2.6002393 TCGA-27-1831 -2.599653 TCGA-27-1831 -2.599653

Looking forward to your help!

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions