Skip to content

Conversation

@FriederikeHanssen
Copy link
Contributor

Closes #682

PR checklist

  • This comment contains a description of changes (with reason).
  • If you've fixed a bug or added code that should be tested, add tests!
  • If you've added a new tool - have you followed the pipeline conventions in the contribution docs
  • If necessary, also make a PR on the nf-core/sarek branch on the nf-core/test-datasets repository.
  • Make sure your code lints (nf-core lint).
  • Ensure the test suite passes (nextflow run . -profile test,docker --outdir <OUTDIR>).
  • Check for unexpected warnings in debug mode (nextflow run . -profile debug,test,docker --outdir <OUTDIR>).
  • Usage Documentation in docs/usage.md is updated.
  • Output Documentation in docs/output.md is updated.
  • CHANGELOG.md is updated.
  • README.md is updated (including new tool citations and authors/contributors).

maxulysse
maxulysse previously approved these changes Nov 15, 2024
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 16, 2024

nf-core pipelines lint overall result: Passed ✅ ⚠️

Posted for pipeline commit 7ae5034

+| ✅ 215 tests passed       |+
#| ❔  11 tests were ignored |#
!| ❗   4 tests had warnings |!

❗ Test warnings:

  • pipeline_todos - TODO string in main.nf: Optionally add in-text citation tools to this list.
  • pipeline_todos - TODO string in main.nf: Optionally add bibliographic entries to this list.
  • pipeline_todos - TODO string in main.nf: Only uncomment below if logic in toolCitationText/toolBibliographyText has been filled!
  • pipeline_todos - TODO string in base.config: Check the defaults for all processes

❔ Tests ignored:

✅ Tests passed:

Run details

  • nf-core/tools version 3.0.2
  • Run at 2024-11-19 09:08:42

@FriederikeHanssen
Copy link
Contributor Author

Can't get the described flags to work. Asked about here: google/deepvariant#908

@FriederikeHanssen
Copy link
Contributor Author

Tests are currently failing because the test data does not have bqsr quality scores. We need to swap out the data used for deepvariant testing

ext.args = { params.wes ? "--model_type=WES" : "--model_type=WGS" }
ext.args = [
params.wes ? "--model_type=WES" : "--model_type=WGS" ,
!params.skip_tools?.contains("baserecalibrator") ? "--make_examples_extra_args '--parse_sam_aux_fields=true,--use_original_quality_scores=true'" : ''
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
!params.skip_tools?.contains("baserecalibrator") ? "--make_examples_extra_args '--parse_sam_aux_fields=true,--use_original_quality_scores=true'" : ''
!params.skip_tools?.contains("baserecalibrator") ? "--make_examples_extra_args 'parse_sam_aux_fields=true,use_original_quality_scores=true'" : ''

That way it works for me.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Deepvariant requires additional cli option for recalibrated BAM files

3 participants