Skip to content

Conversation

@nibix
Copy link
Collaborator

@nibix nibix commented Oct 31, 2025

Description

This introduces tests for CCS which can be targeted against different cluster configuration sets.

This is in preparation for the "Improved index resolution" project #5399 and allows us to test the different privilege evaluation implementations and compare their behavior.

Check List

  • New functionality includes testing
  • New functionality has been documented
  • Commits are signed per the DCO using --signoff

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.
For more information on following Developer Certificate of Origin and signing off your commits, please check here.

Signed-off-by: Nils Bandener <nils.bandener@eliatra.com>
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 31, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 73.27%. Comparing base (b07702d) to head (e44ed30).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5762      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   73.30%   73.27%   -0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         435      435              
  Lines       26485    26491       +6     
  Branches     3945     3945              
==========================================
- Hits        19416    19410       -6     
- Misses       5188     5199      +11     
- Partials     1881     1882       +1     

see 8 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant