Replies: 2 comments
-
I think there is nothing stopping you from adding your own grid module to scss and using it whenever needed. In my case this is not often needed, so I prefer minimal code in Pico scss source files. Speed above all... |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
Why use utility classes at all? Seems a bit too tailwindy to me. Creating a bunch of utility classes to try and abstract CSS grid away seems to me harder and more cumbersome than just using the actual CSS grid. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
I understand that PicoCSS takes a very minimal approach, which is why the grid system is also similarly simple. I still want to suggest utility classes for the span of a grid column because with this the grid becomes a lot more powerful and useful.
I'm making the numbers up as I type but I want to imagine that 50% of people that want to use a grid are too limited with Pico's current offering. The one feature that people will miss the most is defining a column to be wider than one element. Having this option would allow so much more flexibility and yet the implementation is straight forward. I think this easily covers the need of 90% of people without needing custom CSS or the Bootstrap grid on top.
I think the final solution would be something like this:
So this...
...would work. In my mind
span-2
,span-3
andspan-4
is more than enough.What do you think?
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions