Hi, STF teams and @MartinHahner @MarioBijelic , It seems that the provided annotations space is ([ref](https://github.com/princeton-computational-imaging/SeeingThroughFog?tab=readme-ov-file#labeling)) ``` - Obstacle - Vehicle - PassengerCar - Large Vehicle - RidableVehicle - Pedestrian - DontCare ```  However, In the [supplement materials of your published paper](https://openaccess.thecvf.com/content_CVPR_2020/supplemental/Bijelic_Seeing_Through_Fog_CVPR_2020_supplemental.pdf), in Figure 2, or the 2nd paragraph of Sec 1.2, you wrote that, ``` We label objects according to the following types/classes: Pedestrian, Truck, Car, Cyclist, and DontCare. ``` <img width="1670" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/987f7ff0-705d-42f2-95e3-e36ca0ea8242" /> Meanwhile, the Figure 2 is also do the statistics based on the classes named `Pedestrian, Truck, Car, Cyclist, and DontCare`. <img width="1653" alt="Image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/509db08e-919c-4a0b-a897-bc392fd5212f" /> The annotations space between the given data and the one in supplement materials is different. Is there any mistake, or there is somewhere misunderstanding ? Thanks and hope for your reply.