Skip to content

Conversation

@tothtamas28
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@tothtamas28 tothtamas28 self-assigned this Oct 31, 2025
@tothtamas28 tothtamas28 marked this pull request as ready for review October 31, 2025 14:47
Copy link
Collaborator

@dkcumming dkcumming left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think this makes sense, did you try it out on proofs first to see if it also worked with symbolic stuff fine? Not that I think you wouldn't but it might have been overlooked

@tothtamas28
Copy link
Contributor Author

I think this makes sense, did you try it out on proofs first to see if it also worked with symbolic stuff fine? Not that I think you wouldn't but it might have been overlooked

Tested on test_process_approve for both symbolic and concrete, bot runs complete succesfully.

@automergerpr-permission-manager automergerpr-permission-manager bot merged commit 9e6f5c5 into feature/p-token Nov 3, 2025
7 checks passed
@automergerpr-permission-manager automergerpr-permission-manager bot deleted the set-data-len branch November 3, 2025 10:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants