You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
In a future major release of Containerlab, I would like to suggest to introduce a way to support extensability for [Kings] (https://containerlab.dev/manual/kinds/)
At first, I can think about a plugins style architecture where each Kings would become a plugin.
Additionnly we could also consider add a way to extend an existing King (plugin).
As use cases, I can think about using Kings for IoT devices/ NAS appliances / ...
This discussion was converted from issue #2567 on September 16, 2025 09:27.
Heading
Bold
Italic
Quote
Code
Link
Numbered list
Unordered list
Task list
Attach files
Mention
Reference
Menu
reacted with thumbs up emoji reacted with thumbs down emoji reacted with laugh emoji reacted with hooray emoji reacted with confused emoji reacted with heart emoji reacted with rocket emoji reacted with eyes emoji
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
In a future major release of Containerlab, I would like to suggest to introduce a way to support extensability for [Kings] (https://containerlab.dev/manual/kinds/)
At first, I can think about a plugins style architecture where each Kings would become a plugin.
Additionnly we could also consider add a way to extend an existing King (plugin).
As use cases, I can think about using Kings for IoT devices/ NAS appliances / ...
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions