Skip to content

Feature Request: "best observed" parameters for "best" classification output on test data and some accompanying commentary on why. #195

@wbsp

Description

@wbsp

This is such a rich and helpful illustration! Thanks for building it.

I would love to see a user interface capability where you could just load some parameters that are known to produce a really great outcome in the classification for each dataset. To motivate this, I spent a lot of time experimenting with the "two spirals" example. It took me a while to converge on a set of parameters that did something reasonable. Every step of the way was really valuable in learning, especially seeing the sensitivity of the classification to different activation functions, number of {layers, neurons}, inputs, etc -- but it would really cool to just be able to push a button at the end of it and maybe see a really good set of parameters and maybe even some commentary on why they work.

some really bad inputs and why they are bad could be cool too :)

Again, amazing work. thanks for building and sharing!

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions