Skip to content

Conversation

@lshaw8317
Copy link
Collaborator

@lshaw8317 lshaw8317 commented Nov 24, 2025

In order to fully implement ironArray/Caterva2#279, need this PR which adds a save method to LazyUDF class in blosc2.

Also fixes #533

Copy link
Member

@FrancescAlted FrancescAlted left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good work! I am just wondering if we can still use the commented out code that checks for special values. I don't remember if there is some benchmark that exercises this code, but it could well be the case. Can you double chek that?

@lshaw8317
Copy link
Collaborator Author

There are benchmarks for filling/accessing schunks with special values, but none for lazy expression calculations which use operands with special values, which is the context in which the commented-out code would be executed.

@FrancescAlted FrancescAlted self-requested a review November 27, 2025 14:06
Copy link
Member

@FrancescAlted FrancescAlted left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. In case we are not going to need the commented code here, better remove it.

@lshaw8317 lshaw8317 merged commit aa8712a into main Nov 27, 2025
14 checks passed
@lshaw8317 lshaw8317 deleted the save_lazyudf branch November 27, 2025 14:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

LazyUDF fails with integer indices

3 participants