Skip to content

Conversation

sinanmohd
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Summary of Changes

Hello @sinanmohd, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request refactors the infrastructure configuration, primarily moving NixOS configurations into a new infra/nixos directory structure to support multi-node Kubernetes deployments. It updates SOPS encryption rules for better key management and refines Terraform configurations for Azure, including setting up distinct primary and ingress nodes with specific network and storage configurations.

Highlights

  • Directory Restructuring: Reorganized NixOS configurations from nix/nixos to infra/nixos for improved modularity and clarity.
  • SOPS Key Management Enhancement: Updated .sops.yaml to use more descriptive key aliases and key_groups for precise access control, particularly for new primary and ingress Kubernetes nodes.
  • NixOS Node Specialization: Replaced a single "master" NixOS configuration with distinct primary and ingress node configurations, enabling tailored setups for different Kubernetes roles.
  • K3s Setup Refinement: Modified the K3s module to externalize the server token into a dedicated secrets file and moved clusterInit to the primary node's specific configuration.
  • Azure Infrastructure Provisioning: Introduced new Terraform configurations for an Azure ingress subnet and network security group, and added a dedicated NFS disk for the primary Kubernetes node.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request refactors the infrastructure configuration, moving from a single 'master' node setup to a more modular 'primary' and 'ingress' node structure. The changes improve the organization of NixOS and Terraform code. However, I've found several critical issues that will prevent the infrastructure from deploying correctly. These include placeholder values, incorrect firewall rules in Terraform, and dangling references to deleted resources in the Terraform configuration for the primary node. Please address these issues to ensure a successful deployment.

@sinanmohd sinanmohd merged commit d9dbf55 into master Sep 1, 2025
4 of 5 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant