chore: allow installation of lib-asserts v3 #33
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
TavoNiievez
approved these changes
Oct 26, 2025
Contributor
Author
|
@TavoNiievez Thank you! Do you plan to tag a new release for this package (and codeception/codeception)? |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
codeception/lib-assertsis a direct dependency ofcodeception/codeceptionwhich itself is a direct dependency ofcodeception/module-asserts.I tested my changes locally by using a dev version of codeception which allows lib-asserts v3 and the CI was still green.
I'm going to prepare a PR which allows lib-asserts v3 in
codeception/codeceptionas well.