Skip to content

Conversation

jkallogjeri
Copy link

No description provided.

@jkallogjeri jkallogjeri requested a review from forgxyz September 17, 2023 20:13
@WHYTEWYLL
Copy link

  • The block observability model seems adequate.

  • However, for transactions, I think we'll need an external source because the block log doesn't provide the number of transactions per block. If im correct transactions aren't limited to just swaps; they can represent any type of event. Therefore, we should group all events by the block timestamp and compare that to the number of transactions within each block.

If that's not feasible, we may have to limit our assurance to the block itself.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants