Skip to content

Conversation

yannqi
Copy link

@yannqi yannqi commented Nov 17, 2022

In line 64, Change the softmax dim from 2 to 1.
According to this line,
probs = F.softmax(self.scale * probs, dim=2)# batch x k x hw

In this code, the input dimension is [batch_size, num_class, fh*fw]. And the softmax dimension is 2, which means that the summation of the dimensions of the feature map (fh*fw) is one.

However, in my opinion, I thinke the softmax dimension should be 1 to make the summation of the dimension of the num_class (num_class) is one.

The corrected code is as follows:
probs = F.softmax(self.scale * probs, dim=1)# batch x num_class x hw

By the way, I had report this to issue, but without answer.
And I have a simple comparative experimental verification, the results show that dim1 can convergence faster, and get a better mIOU.

In line 64, Change the softmax dim from 2 to 1.  
According to this line,
`probs = F.softmax(self.scale * probs, dim=2)# batch x k x hw`
In this code, the input dimension is [batch_size, num_class, fh\*fw].
And the softmax dimension is 2, which means that the summation of the dimensions of the feature map (fh\*fw) is one.

However, in my opinion, I thinke the softmax dimension should be 1 to make the summation of the dimension of the num_class (num_class) is one.

The corrected code is as follows:
`probs = F.softmax(self.scale * probs, dim=1)# batch x num_class x hw`
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant