Skip to content

Conversation

@mitchelsellers
Copy link
Contributor

@mitchelsellers mitchelsellers commented Feb 17, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • The user form now offers additional options, including a toggle switch for setting a default password.
    • A disabled terms agreement option and a new “Select Your Options” section with extra checkboxes are now available.
    • Enhanced checkbox styling and improved label positioning deliver a more modern, intuitive form experience.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 17, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request introduces new properties to a model and updates the associated view to reflect these changes with additional checkbox inputs. A new TagHelper class is added to render checkbox controls with Bootstrap styling and improved model binding. In addition, the label generation method is extended to accept customizable parameters for enhanced HTML output. These changes facilitate better user input options and more flexible form rendering in the ASP.NET Core application.

Changes

Files Change Summary
src/.../SampleModel.cs
src/.../StandardForm.cshtml
Added new boolean properties (SetDefaultPassword, AgreeToTerms, Item1, Item2, Item3, Item4) in the model and updated the view to include corresponding checkboxes, with attributes such as is-switch for toggling and disabled for read-only agreement.
src/.../FormCheckboxTagHelper.cs
src/.../FormElementMixin.cs
Introduced the FormCheckboxTagHelper class to render Bootstrap-compliant checkbox controls with support for properties like ContainerClass, Disabled, and IsSwitch. Modified the AddLabel method in the mixin to accept additional parameters (cssClass, isPostElement) for flexible label placement.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant V as View
    participant T as FormCheckboxTagHelper
    participant G as IHtmlGenerator
    participant E as FormElementMixinExtensions

    V->>T: Request checkbox rendering for a model property
    T->>G: Generate input element with type "checkbox"
    alt Checkbox is disabled
        T-->>T: Add "disabled" attribute and "form-check-input" class
    else Normal checkbox
        T-->>T: Add "form-check-input" class
    end
    T->>E: Call AddLabel(output, cssClass, isPostElement)
    E-->>T: Append label to correct output section
    T->>V: Return rendered checkbox HTML
Loading

Poem

I'm a little rabbit 🐇 in a code-filled glen,
Hopping through changes, again and again.
Checkboxes and labels, all crisp and neat,
With toggles and defaults making forms complete.
A happy nibble of code for every critter’s treat!
🥕 Happy coding, from my burrow so sweet!


🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@codacy-production
Copy link

Coverage summary from Codacy

See diff coverage on Codacy

Coverage variation Diff coverage
-4.00% (target: -1.00%) 11.54%
Coverage variation details
Coverable lines Covered lines Coverage
Common ancestor commit (4ba3a81) 465 398 85.59%
Head commit (223e59a) 489 (+24) 399 (+1) 81.60% (-4.00%)

Coverage variation is the difference between the coverage for the head and common ancestor commits of the pull request branch: <coverage of head commit> - <coverage of common ancestor commit>

Diff coverage details
Coverable lines Covered lines Diff coverage
Pull request (#45) 26 3 11.54%

Diff coverage is the percentage of lines that are covered by tests out of the coverable lines that the pull request added or modified: <covered lines added or modified>/<coverable lines added or modified> * 100%

See your quality gate settings    Change summary preferences

Codacy stopped sending the deprecated coverage status on June 5th, 2024. Learn more

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Nitpick comments (3)
src/AspNetCore.Utilities.Bootstrap5TagHelpers.Sample/Models/SampleModel.cs (1)

43-44: Consider adding a description attribute for SetDefaultPassword.

Add a [Description] attribute to provide more context about what this setting does and its implications.

 [Display(Name = "Set Default Password")]
+[Description("When enabled, a default password will be generated and set for the user.")]
 public bool SetDefaultPassword { get; set; }
src/AspNetCore.Utilities.Bootstrap5TagHelpers.Sample/Views/Home/StandardForm.cshtml (1)

33-39: Improve the checkbox group structure and styling.

The checkbox group can be enhanced with better styling and more descriptive text.

 <div class="mb-3">
-    <label>Select Your Options</label>
+    <label class="form-label fw-bold">Preferences</label>
+    <p class="text-muted small mb-2">Please select your preferences below:</p>
-    <form-checkbox asp-for="Item1" container-class=""></form-checkbox>
+    <form-checkbox asp-for="Item1" container-class="ms-2"></form-checkbox>
-    <form-checkbox asp-for="Item2" container-class=""></form-checkbox>
+    <form-checkbox asp-for="Item2" container-class="ms-2"></form-checkbox>
-    <form-checkbox asp-for="Item3" container-class=""></form-checkbox>
+    <form-checkbox asp-for="Item3" container-class="ms-2"></form-checkbox>
-    <form-checkbox asp-for="Item4" container-class=""></form-checkbox>
+    <form-checkbox asp-for="Item4" container-class="ms-2"></form-checkbox>
 </div>
src/AspNetCore.Utilities.Bootstrap5TagHelpers/Form/FormCheckboxTagHelper.cs (1)

67-72: Enhance switch accessibility and validation.

When rendering as a switch, ensure proper ARIA attributes and validation.

-var groupClass = $"form-check {ContainerClass}";
+var groupClass = $"form-check {SafeContainerClass}";
 if (IsSwitch)
 {
     groupClass += " form-switch";
+    output.Attributes.SetAttribute("role", "switch");
-    output.Attributes.Add("role", "switch");
+    output.Attributes.SetAttribute("aria-checked", For.Model?.ToString()?.ToLower() ?? "false");
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4ba3a81 and 223e59a.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • src/AspNetCore.Utilities.Bootstrap5TagHelpers.Sample/Models/SampleModel.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/AspNetCore.Utilities.Bootstrap5TagHelpers.Sample/Views/Home/StandardForm.cshtml (1 hunks)
  • src/AspNetCore.Utilities.Bootstrap5TagHelpers/Form/FormCheckboxTagHelper.cs (1 hunks)
  • src/AspNetCore.Utilities.Bootstrap5TagHelpers/Form/FormElementMixin.cs (1 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
  • GitHub Check: Build and Analyze
  • GitHub Check: Codacy Static Code Analysis
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/AspNetCore.Utilities.Bootstrap5TagHelpers/Form/FormElementMixin.cs (1)

37-52: LGTM! Well-structured label generation with flexible placement.

The changes to the AddLabel method are well-implemented, providing good flexibility for label placement and styling while maintaining clean code structure.

Comment on lines +46 to +47
[Display(Name = "Agree to Terms (Disabled)")]
public bool AgreeToTerms { get; set; } = true;
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add Required attribute for terms agreement.

Since this is a terms agreement checkbox, consider making it required and adding a description.

 [Display(Name = "Agree to Terms (Disabled)")]
+[Required(ErrorMessage = "You must agree to the terms to continue.")]
+[Description("By checking this box, you agree to our terms and conditions.")]
 public bool AgreeToTerms { get; set; } = true;
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
[Display(Name = "Agree to Terms (Disabled)")]
public bool AgreeToTerms { get; set; } = true;
[Display(Name = "Agree to Terms (Disabled)")]
[Required(ErrorMessage = "You must agree to the terms to continue.")]
[Description("By checking this box, you agree to our terms and conditions.")]
public bool AgreeToTerms { get; set; } = true;

@mitchelsellers mitchelsellers merged commit 8095c8c into develop Feb 17, 2025
3 of 5 checks passed
@mitchelsellers mitchelsellers deleted the feature/form-check-support branch February 17, 2025 19:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add Support for Checkboxes

2 participants