-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 85
JSON Encoder #483
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. Weβll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
JSON Encoder #483
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @alanzhang25, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request aims to standardize and centralize JSON encoding practices across the codebase. By introducing a new json_encoder
utility based on FastAPI's jsonable_encoder
, it replaces various ad-hoc and orjson
-specific serialization methods, leading to more consistent, robust, and maintainable data serialization for API requests and internal data structures.
Highlights
- New JSON Encoder Utility: A new module,
src/judgeval/common/api/json_encoder.py
, has been introduced. It provides a centralizedjson_encoder
function that leverages FastAPI'sjsonable_encoder
for robust serialization of various Python types, including Pydantic models, with a fallback torepr()
for unencodable objects. - Dependency Update: The
fastapi
library (version>=0.116.1
) has been added as a new dependency inpyproject.toml
to support the integration ofjsonable_encoder
. - Consolidation of Serialization Logic: Multiple custom and
orjson
-specific serialization methods across the codebase, such as_serialize
inapi.py
,_safe_json_handle
inspan_transformer.py
, and_serialize_value
intrace.py
, have been removed and replaced with calls to the new, unifiedjson_encoder
. - Improved API Request Handling: The
JudgmentAPIClient
now utilizes the newjson_encoder
when making requests, passing the serialized payload via thejson
parameter of therequests
library, which simplifies and standardizes API payload serialization.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with π and π on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. β©
Warning Gemini encountered an error creating the review. You can try again by commenting |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Lets revert the uv.lock and pyproject.toml, and check travel_agent for testing |
4432386
to
4c2bcc4
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
looks good, check the few nonblocking comments and feel free to update if desired.
I tested this locally and it looks good.
@@ -111,7 +110,7 @@ def _do_request( | |||
r = requests.request( | |||
method, | |||
url, | |||
data=self._serialize(payload), | |||
json=json_encoder(payload), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nice!
4c2bcc4
to
3d045eb
Compare
π Summary
π₯ Demo of Changes
β Checklist