Clarify PropTypes comment - no changes needed #372
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
9 tasks
Copilot
AI
changed the title
[WIP] Add feedback resolution for third cycle TableView test
Clarify PropTypes comment - no changes needed
Nov 4, 2025
belanglos
force-pushed
the
issues/KP-433-implement-periods-without-shared
branch
2 times, most recently
from
c7ccca1 to
51442a4
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Addressed review comment asking for clarification on bot reviewer's PropTypes feedback in
Article.jsx.Changes
classNames = [],uiKey = '') are correctly not marked as.isRequiredin PropTypesThe current implementation is correct: optional props with default parameter values should not be marked as required in PropTypes.
💬 We'd love your input! Share your thoughts on Copilot coding agent in our 2 minute survey.