Test SonarQube

[MostafaNafie]

No description provided.

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
4 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[MostafaNafie]

[MCP] Code Quality Review

[MCP] I've reviewed this PR and noticed several areas that need attention:

SonarQube Issues:
[MCP] The SonarQube analysis detected 4 new issues that should be addressed before merging. These likely include code smells, bugs, or maintainability issues.

Test Coverage:
[MCP] The 0% test coverage on new code is concerning. Consider adding unit tests to ensure the functionality works as expected and to prevent regressions.

Code Standards:
[MCP] While the Quality Gate passed, the presence of new issues suggests the code could be improved to follow better practices.

Documentation:
[MCP] This PR lacks a description. Please add context about what changes were made and why.

Recommendations:
[MCP] 1. Fix the 4 SonarQube issues identified
[MCP] 2. Add unit tests to improve coverage
[MCP] 3. Add a meaningful PR description
[MCP] 4. Consider following Swift coding best practices

[MCP] Overall, while this demonstrates SonarQube integration working correctly, the code quality issues need to be resolved before this can be safely merged to the shared-data-layer branch.