-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 195
[17.0][MIG] maintenance_inspection #524
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: 17.0
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
8b7e556 to
1b072dd
Compare
ypapouin
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
|
ping @ypapouin |
rrebollo
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Please consider my suggestions. Also, I think the last commit should be squashed.
I think it would be better to leave that revert history as is, don't you think? |
Let's see what others think about it |
I have no problem removing it; I just checked different pull requests and there are commits like that, but I'll proceed to remove it. Thanks. |
7411373 to
43f1104
Compare
rrebollo
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review: Great work! The code looks good to me (LGTM). Thank you for your contribution! I've provided a few suggestions for your consideration—feel free to address them as you see fit.
Currently translated at 100.0% (34 of 34 strings) Translation: maintenance-14.0/maintenance-14.0-maintenance_inspection Translate-URL: https://translation.odoo-community.org/projects/maintenance-14-0/maintenance-14-0-maintenance_inspection/fr/
43f1104 to
5375cf9
Compare
|
One silly questions, a lot of the changed done in the migration should be in the 18 migration too, like the "readonly" fields or Command changes. |
|
@edescalona , I previously wrote that you have to remove these two (non-squashed on purpose) commits to be compatible with 17.0:
@etobella I can replicate code changes on my 18.0 PR since all requests are relevant. Maybe it's more "clean" to make changes in the 18.0 PR and rebase this PR after that ? |

@BinhexTeam
Based on