Add id field to v2.ProblemConfig
#442
Conversation
* Update schema * v2.Problem.id * v2.ProblemConfig.id Related to PEtab-dev/PEtab#646. Closes PEtab-dev#441.
Codecov Report❌ Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #442 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 74.82% 74.80% -0.02%
==========================================
Files 62 62
Lines 6792 6803 +11
Branches 1203 1205 +2
==========================================
+ Hits 5082 5089 +7
- Misses 1255 1258 +3
- Partials 455 456 +1 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
petab/v2/core.py
Outdated
| @property | ||
| def id(self) -> str: | ||
| """The ID of the PEtab problem if set, ``None`` otherwise.""" | ||
| return self.config.id if self.config else None |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| @property | |
| def id(self) -> str: | |
| """The ID of the PEtab problem if set, ``None`` otherwise.""" | |
| return self.config.id if self.config else None | |
| @property | |
| def id(self) -> str | None: | |
| """The ID of the PEtab problem if set, ``None`` otherwise.""" | |
| return self.config.id if self.config else None |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Ah, yeah, I was undecided whether we should go for None or '' if no ID is set. I think always having a string could be more convenient. Any preference?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hm, I think the Pythonic way would be to use None, because it's the absence of an ID. Also the "no ID" case is a special case that will always need to be handled, e.g. to avoid writing a file name .yaml to disc. Maybe using None then makes it easier to detect errors since the special case is more explicit. No strong opinion though.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Memo to self: The yaml schema may need updating. If we distinguish empty strings and null/None, the former should raise a validation error whereas the latter should not.
3 participants
Related to PEtab-dev/PEtab#646.
Closes #441.