EIP-7002

[eladiosch]

This PR implements the flow to allow Puffer or the node operators to exit validators from the beacon chain with an on-chain transaction

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 89.47368% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
mainnet-contracts/src/PufferModuleManager.sol	80.00%	1 Missing ⚠️
mainnet-contracts/src/PufferProtocol.sol	87.50%	1 Missing ⚠️

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
mainnet-contracts/src/PufferModule.sol	96.87% <100.00%> (+9.37%)	⬆️
mainnet-contracts/src/PufferModuleManager.sol	88.88% <80.00%> (+5.55%)	⬆️
mainnet-contracts/src/PufferProtocol.sol	93.63% <87.50%> (+2.47%)	⬆️

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[ksatyarth2]

in AccessManager contract, one selector can be assigned to only one role for a target contract. so you can't assign both ROLE_ID_OPERATIONS_PAYMASTER and ROLE_ID_PUFFER_PROTOCOL role to triggerValidatorsExit function.
checkout AccessManager._setTargetFunctionRole function

[ksatyarth2]

either:

• grant both roles to the accounts - but this could be dangerous security wise
• or better create a new specific role and grant to both accounts.

[eladiosch]

Added role ROLE_ID_VALIDATOR_EJECTOR. I used 28 instead of 27, because I used 27 in PR#136