Support no-std #367
Open
Support no-std #367
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This was referenced Jun 22, 2025
ahdinosaur
added a commit
to ahdinosaur/blinksy
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 23, 2025
Seems [`noise-rs`](https://github.com/Razaekel/noise-rs) crates a permutation table for every noise function you want to query. Instead, [`noise-functions`](https://github.com/bluurryy/noise-functions) seems more suitable for embedded micros: it uses the same static data for any number of noise functions/seeds, plus it uses f32 instead of f64 which matches what we use. Also it has proper no-std support built-in, so I can drop [my fork of `noise-rs`](Razaekel/noise-rs#367).
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Hi, thanks for noise-rs.
Here is a pull request to improve no-std support.
This is currently working on an embedded system to control LEDs, but haven't tested further.
Open to feedback on where to go from here.
See also: #251 (comment)