Skip to content

Conversation

@Fethbita
Copy link

@Fethbita Fethbita commented Dec 5, 2025

I only added the LCM for Uint for now, I think it should not be difficult to add it to other types as well. I have never used the Int type so if that is different, might take some time.

@Fethbita Fethbita changed the title Adds LCM for Uint Add LCM for Uint Dec 5, 2025
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 5, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 79.92%. Comparing base (59b58ec) to head (a19786e).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1028      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   79.87%   79.92%   +0.04%     
==========================================
  Files         163      164       +1     
  Lines       17737    17779      +42     
==========================================
+ Hits        14167    14209      +42     
  Misses       3570     3570              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@Fethbita Fethbita mentioned this pull request Dec 5, 2025
42 tasks
@tarcieri tarcieri requested review from fjarri and tarcieri December 10, 2025 15:15
assert_eq!(lhs.lcm_uint(&rhs), target);
}

fn run_tests<const LIMBS: usize, const WIDE_LIMBS: usize>()
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

What's our policy on proptests? Seems like it would be useful to have one here.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm definitely a fan of proptests

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants