Skip to content

Add spell checking configuration #1303

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jul 29, 2025
Merged

Conversation

ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member

Summary

This PR adds comprehensive spell checking configuration to maintain code quality.

Changes

.typos.toml Configuration

  • Added comprehensive configuration file
  • Allows legitimate Julia/scientific terms (e.g., setp, indexin, ists)
  • Prevents false positives for domain-specific terminology
  • Follows SciML ecosystem standards

SpellCheck.yml Workflow

  • Adds GitHub Actions spell checking on pull requests
  • Follows SciML standard (matches ModelingToolkit.jl)
  • Automatically prevents typos in future contributions

Benefits

  • ✅ Automated spell checking on all PRs
  • ✅ No false positives for technical terminology
  • ✅ Consistent with SciML ecosystem standards
  • ✅ Zero maintenance overhead

🤖 Generated by SciML typos standardization

@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas requested a review from TorkelE July 29, 2025 13:34
Copy link
Member

@TorkelE TorkelE left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not familair with the new CI workflows, but all the text changes looks good to me

@ChrisRackauckas
Copy link
Member Author

It'll just do a spell check, that's about it. These are the fixes it found, so if you like the changes then it worked 😅

@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas merged commit b966c7e into master Jul 29, 2025
1 of 17 checks passed
@ChrisRackauckas ChrisRackauckas deleted the add-typos-spellcheck-config branch July 29, 2025 14:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants