Skip to content

Adds respond_to_missing? in classes where method_missing is implemented. #65

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Adds respond_to_missing? in classes where method_missing is implemented. #65

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

shaunakpp
Copy link
Contributor

@shaunakpp shaunakpp commented Oct 11, 2018 •
edited
Loading

  • Also uses guard clause instead of deep conditional nesting in scope.rb method_missing
  • Also adds 'super' check in method_missing so that it doesn't blow on actual missing methods

This change is Reviewable

@shaunakpp
Adds respond_to_missing? in classes where method_missing is implemented.
493a653 
Also uses guard clause instead of deep conditional nesting in scope.rb method_missing
Also adds 'super' check in method_missing so that it doesn't blow on actual missing methods
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
1 participant
@shaunakpp