-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 377
Increasing support for MiKTeX #1495
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Conversation
Only use `texify` when Windows/Miktex is missing `Perl`
…`get_aux_directory()`
|
@maboloshi Sorry this is quite a late review 😬. One thing I'm unsure of in this: does MiKTeX now install latexmk by default? The real reason we were using texify with MiKTeX is that is was installed and available by default and latexmk wasn't (I never had any issues using latexmk with MiKTeX on Windows... there was just the extra install step which also installed the Perl interpreter, etc.). |
|
@ig0774 In fact, |
c49c2ff to
bd5a43f
Compare
38346cc to
fc0d179
Compare
400c2a7 to
ddbe797
Compare
02e36c2 to
0970d7e
Compare
e32284f to
dea724a
Compare
|
If pre-conditions are met (latexmk and perl are present) latexmk can be used with MikTeX by just setting There's probably no need to change the default builder |
2.9.6300. Therefore, information about its usage has been added.traditionalbuilder use compiler drivertexify.