Skip to content

Conversation

YoshiRulz
Copy link
Member

This goes back to the initial implementation 6d87be1. @Asnivor Can you say whether this matches the original intent? Or just whether it still functions correctly? That's probably more important.

(Throwback to my comment 6 years ago in 1d5a097.)

@YoshiRulz YoshiRulz mentioned this pull request Feb 14, 2025
2 tasks
@Morilli
Copy link
Collaborator

Morilli commented Feb 19, 2025

I sadly can't test this, but I find it highly likely that both this and the original code fail horribly in case a duplicate is found.

That said, I looked at how this dictionary is used and don't even see how that makes any sense and works, so...

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants