Skip to content

Conversation

@jmenti
Copy link
Collaborator

@jmenti jmenti commented Dec 10, 2025

This PR adds initial performance numbers for 11.02.08.02 on the following devices:

  • AM62X
  • AM62P
  • AM62L
  • AM62D
  • AM64X

There are missing sections for the following which are expected to be added in subsequent PRs:

  • Ethernet
  • LPM
  • RT CYCLIC

@github-actions
Copy link

New warnings found with rstcheck:

source/devices/AM62PX/linux/RT_Linux_Performance_Guide.rst:77: (WARNING/2) The "csv-table" directive requires content; none supplied.
source/devices/AM62LX/linux/RT_Linux_Performance_Guide.rst:76: (WARNING/2) The "csv-table" directive requires content; none supplied.
source/devices/AM62X/linux/RT_Linux_Performance_Guide.rst:83: (WARNING/2) The "csv-table" directive requires content; none supplied.

@github-actions
Copy link

New unreachable files found with check_files.py:

WARNING:root:File not used: source/devices/AM64X/linux/img/R5_0_0_m1_ipc_latency.png
WARNING:root:File not used: source/devices/AM64X/linux/img/R5_0_0_m490_ipc_latency.png
WARNING:root:File not used: source/devices/AM64X/linux/img/m4_0_m490_ipc_latency.png
WARNING:root:File not used: source/devices/AM64X/linux/img/m4_0_m1_ipc_latency.png

@github-actions
Copy link

New unreachable files found with check_files.py:

WARNING:root:File not used: source/devices/AM64X/linux/img/R5_0_0_m1_ipc_latency.png
WARNING:root:File not used: source/devices/AM64X/linux/img/R5_0_0_m490_ipc_latency.png
WARNING:root:File not used: source/devices/AM64X/linux/img/m4_0_m490_ipc_latency.png
WARNING:root:File not used: source/devices/AM64X/linux/img/m4_0_m1_ipc_latency.png

@StaticRocket
Copy link
Member

@jmenti , can you delete the listed image files since they are no longer referenced as a result of this commit?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@jmenti jmenti left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think there might only be small regression for EMMC AM62 @ u-boot and AM62 LP @ Linux stages, will create a jira to document these

@praneethbajjuri praneethbajjuri self-requested a review December 11, 2025 21:17
@v-singh1
Copy link
Contributor

@jmenti @praneethbajjuri : is there any reason why AM62D RT Linux performance numbers are not part of this PR ?

@cshilwant
Copy link
Member

@jmenti @praneethbajjuri : is there any reason why AM62D RT Linux performance numbers are not part of this PR ?

@v-singh1 RT linux performance guide only comprises of Cyclic tests numbers which @bryanbrattlof generally runs manually on all platforms & creates a follow up PR.

Add the initial Linux & RT Linux performance guide for 11.02 release
for AM62L.

Note that the following sections are missing & will be added seperately.
- ETHERNET
- LPM
- RT CYCLIC

Signed-off-by: Judith Mendez <jm@ti.com>
Add the initial Linux & RT Linux performance guide for 11.02 release
for AM62P.

Note that the following sections are missing & will be added seperately.
- ETHERNET
- LPM
- RT CYCLIC

Signed-off-by: Judith Mendez <jm@ti.com>
Add the initial Linux & RT Linux performance guide for 11.02 release
for AM64.

Note that the following sections are missing & will be added seperately.
- ETHERNET
- RT CYCLIC

Signed-off-by: Judith Mendez <jm@ti.com>
Add the initial Linux & RT Linux performance guide for 11.02 release
for AM62.

Note that the following sections are missing & will be added seperately.
- ETHERNET
- LPM
- RT CYCLIC

Signed-off-by: Judith Mendez <jm@ti.com>
Add the initial Linux performance guide for 11.02 release for AM62D.

Signed-off-by: Judith Mendez <jm@ti.com>
@jmenti
Copy link
Collaborator Author

jmenti commented Dec 12, 2025

I have added IPC latency numbers, RT cyclic, LPM, and Ethernet will be added in a later PR

@praneethbajjuri praneethbajjuri self-requested a review December 12, 2025 23:21
@StaticRocket StaticRocket merged commit 9e52e55 into TexasInstruments:master Dec 13, 2025
5 of 6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants