-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47
Add RankUpdateEuclideanMetric #443
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
| Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
@@ -98,6 +98,84 @@ function Base.show(io::IO, dem::DenseEuclideanMetric) | |||||||
| return print(io, "DenseEuclideanMetric(diag=$(_string_M⁻¹(dem.M⁻¹)))") | ||||||||
| end | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||
| """ | ||||||||
| RankUpdateEuclideanMetric{T,AM,AB,AD,F} <: AbstractMetric | ||||||||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggested change
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
| A Gaussian Euclidean metric whose inverse is constructed by rank-updates. | ||||||||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggested change
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
ErikQQY marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||||||||
| # Fields | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||
| $(TYPEDFIELDS) | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||
| # Constructors | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||
| RankUpdateEuclideanMetric(n::Int) | ||||||||
| RankUpdateEuclideanMetric(M⁻¹, B, D) | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||
| - Construct a Gaussian Euclidean metric of size `(n, n)` with `M⁻¹` being diagonal matrix. | ||||||||
| - Construct a Gaussian Euclidean metric of `M⁻¹`, where `M⁻¹` should be a full rank positive definite matrix, | ||||||||
| and `B` `D` must be chose so that the Woodbury matrix `W = M⁻¹ + B D B^\\mathrm{T}` is positive definite. | ||||||||
|
Comment on lines
+115
to
+117
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. For the other metrics
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. For Pathfinder to safely convert its
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggested change
|
||||||||
|
|
||||||||
| # Example | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||
| ```julia | ||||||||
| julia> RankUpdateEuclideanMetric(3) | ||||||||
| RankUpdateEuclideanMetric(diag=[1.0, 1.0, 1.0]) | ||||||||
| ``` | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||
| # References | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||
| - Ben Bales, Arya Pourzanjani, Aki Vehtari, Linda Petzold, Selecting the Metric in Hamiltonian Monte Carlo, 2019 | ||||||||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. The factorized form used here is due to the Pathfinder paper, so I recommend also citing http://jmlr.org/papers/v23/21-0889.html |
||||||||
| """ | ||||||||
| struct RankUpdateEuclideanMetric{T,AM<:AbstractVecOrMat{T},AB,AD,F} <: AbstractMetric | ||||||||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. More a question than a request: Is there a reason why |
||||||||
| "Diagnal of the inverse of the mass matrix" | ||||||||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggested change
|
||||||||
| M⁻¹::AM | ||||||||
| B::AB | ||||||||
| D::AD | ||||||||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggested change
|
||||||||
| factorization::F | ||||||||
| end | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||
| function woodbury_factorize(A, B, D) | ||||||||
| cholA = cholesky(A isa Diagonal ? A : Symmetric(A)) | ||||||||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Pathfinder's implementation allows for arbitrary PD |
||||||||
| U = cholA.U | ||||||||
| Q, R = qr(U' \ B) | ||||||||
| V = cholesky(Symmetric(muladd(R, D * R', I))).U | ||||||||
| return (U=U, Q=Q, V=V) | ||||||||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggested change
|
||||||||
| end | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||
| function RankUpdateEuclideanMetric(n::Int) | ||||||||
| M⁻¹ = Diagonal(ones(n)) | ||||||||
| B = zeros(n, 0) | ||||||||
| D = zeros(0, 0) | ||||||||
| factorization = woodbury_factorize(M⁻¹, B, D) | ||||||||
| return RankUpdateEuclideanMetric(M⁻¹, B, D, factorization) | ||||||||
| end | ||||||||
|
Comment on lines
+146
to
+152
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Note: this is probably fine for now, but there are multiple ways to form the identity matrix here, and later it might be better to initialize a different way (e.g. for tuning a covariance matrix for factor analysis,
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I know it breaks with the API of other metric constructors, but I think you want to be able to initialize the rank of the update as well. Otherwise you have no way to fix the rank for future tuning algorithms. |
||||||||
| function RankUpdateEuclideanMetric(::Type{T}, n::Int) where {T} | ||||||||
| M⁻¹ = Diagonal(ones(T, n)) | ||||||||
| B = Matrix{T}(undef, n, 0) | ||||||||
| D = Matrix{T}(undef, 0, 0) | ||||||||
| factorization = woodbury_factorize(M⁻¹, B, D) | ||||||||
| return RankUpdateEuclideanMetric(M⁻¹, B, D, factorization) | ||||||||
| end | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||
| function RankUpdateEuclideanMetric(M⁻¹, B, D) | ||||||||
| factorization = woodbury_factorize(M⁻¹, B, D) | ||||||||
| return RankUpdateEuclideanMetric(M⁻¹, B, D, factorization) | ||||||||
| end | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||
| function RankUpdateEuclideanMetric(::Type{T}, sz::Tuple{Int}) where {T} | ||||||||
| return RankUpdateEuclideanMetric(T, first(sz)) | ||||||||
| end | ||||||||
ErikQQY marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||||||||
| RankUpdateEuclideanMetric(sz::Tuple{Int}) = RankUpdateEuclideanMetric(Float64, sz) | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||
| renew(::RankUpdateEuclideanMetric, (M⁻¹, B, D)) = RankUpdateEuclideanMetric(M⁻¹, B, D) | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||
| Base.size(metric::RankUpdateEuclideanMetric, dim...) = size(metric.M⁻¹.diag, dim...) | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||
| function Base.show(io::IO, ::MIME"text/plain", metric::RankUpdateEuclideanMetric) | ||||||||
| return print(io, "RankUpdateEuclideanMetric(diag=$(diag(metric.M⁻¹)))") | ||||||||
|
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Here's another example where calling the full-rank part of the inverse-metric |
||||||||
| end | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||
| # `rand` functions for `metric` types. | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||
| function rand_momentum( | ||||||||
|
|
@@ -131,3 +209,19 @@ function rand_momentum( | |||||||
| ldiv!(metric.cholM⁻¹, r) | ||||||||
| return r | ||||||||
| end | ||||||||
|
|
||||||||
| function rand_momentum( | ||||||||
| rng::Union{AbstractRNG,AbstractVector{<:AbstractRNG}}, | ||||||||
| metric::RankUpdateEuclideanMetric{T}, | ||||||||
| kinetic::GaussianKinetic, | ||||||||
| ::AbstractVecOrMat, | ||||||||
| ) where {T} | ||||||||
| M⁻¹ = metric.M⁻¹ | ||||||||
| r = _randn(rng, T, size(M⁻¹.diag)...) | ||||||||
| F = metric.factorization | ||||||||
| k = min(size(F.U, 1), size(F.V, 1)) | ||||||||
| @views ldiv!(F.V, r isa AbstractVector ? r[1:k] : r[1:k, :]) | ||||||||
| lmul!(F.Q, r) | ||||||||
| ldiv!(F.U, r) | ||||||||
| return r | ||||||||
| end | ||||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Note that because you've defined
Mas just the diagonal part, this equation is incorrect. The full one is https://github.com/mlcolab/Pathfinder.jl/blob/f4ca90dc3d91f077f479d13904a2b6bf99e8ee25/src/integration/advancedhmc.jl#L82, which uses https://github.com/mlcolab/Pathfinder.jl/blob/f4ca90dc3d91f077f479d13904a2b6bf99e8ee25/src/woodbury.jl#L384-L388