Skip to content

Conversation

CommanderStorm
Copy link

Which issue does this PR close?

Closes #497

Rationale for this change

The keys should either all be documented, or all undocumented.
Being partially documented is not quite ideal.

What changes are included in this PR?

The docs change, that some keys did not have docs for their "Supported keys"

Are there any user-facing changes?

Yes, this is a docs change.

/// <https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonECS/latest/developerguide/task-iam-roles.html>
///
/// Supported keys:
/// - `aws_container_credentials_relative_uri`
Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not sure if it is intentional that parts of the options have only the aws_ prefix, parts allow both and parts of the keys only the non-aws prefix.

This is a new feature => different issue, but if there is apetite, I can raise an PR.

I think the best way would be support both aws_suffix and suffix => the most compliant parsing.
Alternative, allowing suffix for all and aws_suffix is also a fine API

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Inconsistent documentation of "Supported Keys"

1 participant