BIP 433: Add P2A BIP #1982
BIP 433: Add P2A BIP #1982
Conversation
|
|
||
| ====Backward Compatibility==== | ||
|
|
||
| Creation of P2A outputs has been considered standard since the deployment of Segwit softfork on the network. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Maybe link here to the SegWit BIP section making them standard.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
the BIPs aren't standardness BIPs, so I'm not sure that helps.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Roasbeef
left a comment
Roasbeef
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for making this. Nearly done with an implementation for btcsuite.
instagibbs
force-pushed
the
2025-09-p2a
branch
from
3451560 to
9ed387c
Compare
murchandamus
left a comment
murchandamus
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looks pretty good already. I got a bag of nits for you.
|
|
||
| ====Backward Compatibility==== | ||
|
|
||
| Creation of P2A outputs has been considered standard since the deployment of Segwit softfork on the network. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
|
This BIP has been assigned number 433! (can update the readme in the PR to reflect assignment) |
|
Please add an entry to the table in the README.md for your BIP, add the number to the preamble, and update the “Created” header to 2025-12-08. |
instagibbs
force-pushed
the
2025-09-p2a
branch
2 times, most recently
from
7ab1a16 to
3afec38
Compare
|
Thanks for the review and number! |
instagibbs
force-pushed
the
2025-09-p2a
branch
from
3afec38 to
ab9bc69
Compare
murchandamus
left a comment
murchandamus
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Changes look good to me. ACK ab9bc69
4 participants
For interoperability with other schemes, it behooves me to write a BIP for this output type. It's already standard to spend in well over half the network.
h/t roasbeef for bothering me about this repeatedly