EPS-1645: Use Common workflow file for PHPCS and fix reported issues #1353
Conversation
akshayurankar48
changed the title
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
| @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ | |||
| { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What: The permissions defined allow broad access to the Downloads directory, which could be a security risk.
Why: Allowing read access to entire directories can expose sensitive files and data to unauthorized access, increasing the risk of a data breach.
How: Consider restricting the permissions to only specific files or subdirectories that are necessary for your application. If possible, use more specific paths that minimize exposure.
| @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ | |||
| { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What: The configuration does not include any mechanism for logging or auditing access to the specified resources.
Why: Without logging, it will be difficult to know who accessed what data and if any unauthorized access occurred. This is critical for security best practices.
How: Consider adding a logging mechanism to track when and by whom the permissions are accessed. This could be an additional configuration option or integrated into your codebase.
| @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ | |||
| { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What: Consider renaming the file to be more descriptive of its content and purpose.
Why: Naming files descriptively helps other developers quickly understand their purpose without needing to open the file, improving maintainability.
How: A more descriptive name might be claude_permissions.local.json or claude_access_control.local.json, highlighting its role in settings.
| @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ | |||
| { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What: There is no documentation or comments to explain the purpose of the JSON structure.
Why: Comments or documentation within the file can guide future developers on how to use or modify the settings correctly, which promotes better practices and reduces errors.
How: Add a comment at the top of the file explaining what it does and any important considerations when modifying it.
| wp_send_json_error( 'Unauthorized user' ); | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| $permalink_structure = get_option('permalink_structure'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What: The error message sent with wp_send_json_error() is currently a static string. Consider adding more context or information about the actual error to the message.
Why: Providing a more descriptive error message can help with troubleshooting and improving user experience during authorization failures.
How: You can modify the line to include user ID or request details for additional context: wp_send_json_error( 'Unauthorized user: ' . get_current_user_id() );.
|
|
||
| // Check if the current user has the capability to manage options. | ||
| if ( ! current_user_can( 'manage_options' ) ) { | ||
| wp_send_json_error( 'Unauthorized user' ); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What: Code indentation and formatting changes are made, which may affect readability for consistent style across the codebase.
Why: While these changes help with aesthetics, it's important to set a coding standard for format consistency that all contributors should follow without mixing coding styles.
How: Ensure that code follows PSR-2 standards or your defined project standards consistently throughout the file.
admin/class-hfe-addons-actions.php
Outdated
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What: Using in_array() without strict checking for types may lead to unexpected results if the $slug values don't match types properly (e.g., integer vs string). Consider using strict checks.
Why: To ensure that comparisons are accurate and to prevent bugs that can arise from type juggling in PHP, especially when dealing with user-defined data.
How: Change the current line to if ( in_array( $slug, $unused_widgets, true ) ) { to enforce strict type comparison in the array check.
| $deactivated[] = $slug; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What: The logic checking in the foreach loop can potentially be optimized by reducing unnecessary calls or checks on $slug. If there are performance concerns with the current data set size, consider refactoring.
Why: Improving efficiency, especially in loops, can have a positive impact on performance, especially if this function is called frequently.
How: Consider using a more streamlined approach, such as caching results if the self::$widget_list is not changing often, or restructuring the data to allow quicker access while iterating.
2 participants
Description
Main Purpose: This pull request aims to update the PHP CodeSniffer (phpcs) workflow file to enhance code quality checks in our continuous integration process.
Key Changes:
.github/workflows/phpcs.ymlfile to reflect the latest coding standards.Additional Notes:
phpcs.ymlfile, ensuring that the new standards align with our project's guidelines.Screenshots
Types of changes
How has this been tested?
Checklist: