-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 10
[lts92] Many VULNS 10-15-2025 #632
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
bmastbergen
merged 11 commits into
ciqlts9_2
from
bmastbergen_ciqlts9_2/many-vulns-10-15-2025
Oct 17, 2025
Merged
[lts92] Many VULNS 10-15-2025 #632
bmastbergen
merged 11 commits into
ciqlts9_2
from
bmastbergen_ciqlts9_2/many-vulns-10-15-2025
Oct 17, 2025
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jira VULN-70087 cve CVE-2022-50087 commit-author Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> commit 689640e When scpi probe fails, at any point, we need to ensure that the scpi_info is not set and will remain NULL until the probe succeeds. If it is not taken care, then it could result use-after-free as the value is exported via get_scpi_ops() and could refer to a memory allocated via devm_kzalloc() but freed when the probe fails. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220701160310.148344-1-sudeep.holla@arm.com Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.19+ Reported-by: huhai <huhai@kylinos.cn> Reviewed-by: Jackie Liu <liuyun01@kylinos.cn> Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> (cherry picked from commit 689640e) Signed-off-by: Brett Mastbergen <bmastbergen@ciq.com>
jira VULN-154359 cve CVE-2023-53186 commit-author Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@gmail.com> commit 0646dc3 Commit 1effe8c ("skbuff: fix coalescing for page_pool fragment recycling") allowed coalescing to proceed with non page pool page and page pool page when @from is cloned, i.e. to->pp_recycle --> false from->pp_recycle --> true skb_cloned(from) --> true However, it actually requires skb_cloned(@from) to hold true until coalescing finishes in this situation. If the other cloned SKB is released while the merging is in process, from_shinfo->nr_frags will be set to 0 toward the end of the function, causing the increment of frag page _refcount to be unexpectedly skipped resulting in inconsistent reference counts. Later when SKB(@to) is released, it frees the page directly even though the page pool page is still in use, leading to use-after-free or double-free errors. So it should be prohibited. The double-free error message below prompted us to investigate: BUG: Bad page state in process swapper/1 pfn:0e0d1 page:00000000c6548b28 refcount:-1 mapcount:0 mapping:0000000000000000 index:0x2 pfn:0xe0d1 flags: 0xfffffc0000000(node=0|zone=1|lastcpupid=0x1fffff) raw: 000fffffc0000000 0000000000000000 ffffffff00000101 0000000000000000 raw: 0000000000000002 0000000000000000 ffffffffffffffff 0000000000000000 page dumped because: nonzero _refcount CPU: 1 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/1 Tainted: G E 6.2.0+ Call Trace: <IRQ> dump_stack_lvl+0x32/0x50 bad_page+0x69/0xf0 free_pcp_prepare+0x260/0x2f0 free_unref_page+0x20/0x1c0 skb_release_data+0x10b/0x1a0 napi_consume_skb+0x56/0x150 net_rx_action+0xf0/0x350 ? __napi_schedule+0x79/0x90 __do_softirq+0xc8/0x2b1 __irq_exit_rcu+0xb9/0xf0 common_interrupt+0x82/0xa0 </IRQ> <TASK> asm_common_interrupt+0x22/0x40 RIP: 0010:default_idle+0xb/0x20 Fixes: 53e0961 ("page_pool: add frag page recycling support in page pool") Signed-off-by: Liang Chen <liangchen.linux@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230413090353.14448-1-liangchen.linux@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> (cherry picked from commit 0646dc3) Signed-off-by: Brett Mastbergen <bmastbergen@ciq.com>
…r length jira VULN-67717 cve CVE-2025-37810 commit-author Frode Isaksen <frode@meta.com> commit 63ccd26 The event count is read from register DWC3_GEVNTCOUNT. There is a check for the count being zero, but not for exceeding the event buffer length. Check that event count does not exceed event buffer length, avoiding an out-of-bounds access when memcpy'ing the event. Crash log: Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address ffffffc0129be000 pc : __memcpy+0x114/0x180 lr : dwc3_check_event_buf+0xec/0x348 x3 : 0000000000000030 x2 : 000000000000dfc4 x1 : ffffffc0129be000 x0 : ffffff87aad60080 Call trace: __memcpy+0x114/0x180 dwc3_interrupt+0x24/0x34 Signed-off-by: Frode Isaksen <frode@meta.com> Fixes: 72246da ("usb: Introduce DesignWare USB3 DRD Driver") Cc: stable <stable@kernel.org> Acked-by: Thinh Nguyen <Thinh.Nguyen@synopsys.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250403072907.448524-1-fisaksen@baylibre.com Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> (cherry picked from commit 63ccd26) Signed-off-by: Brett Mastbergen <bmastbergen@ciq.com>
jira VULN-73373 cve CVE-2025-37914 commit-author Victor Nogueira <victor@mojatatu.com> commit 1a6d0c0 As described in Gerrard's report [1], there are use cases where a netem child qdisc will make the parent qdisc's enqueue callback reentrant. In the case of ets, there won't be a UAF, but the code will add the same classifier to the list twice, which will cause memory corruption. In addition to checking for qlen being zero, this patch checks whether the class was already added to the active_list (cl_is_active) before doing the addition to cater for the reentrant case. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/CAHcdcOm+03OD2j6R0=YHKqmy=VgJ8xEOKuP6c7mSgnp-TEJJbw@mail.gmail.com/ Fixes: 37d9cf1 ("sched: Fix detection of empty queues in child qdiscs") Acked-by: Jamal Hadi Salim <jhs@mojatatu.com> Signed-off-by: Victor Nogueira <victor@mojatatu.com> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250425220710.3964791-4-victor@mojatatu.com Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> (cherry picked from commit 1a6d0c0) Signed-off-by: Brett Mastbergen <bmastbergen@ciq.com>
jira VULN-72064 cve CVE-2025-38200 commit-author Kyungwook Boo <bookyungwook@gmail.com> commit 015bac5 When the device sends a specific input, an integer underflow can occur, leading to MMIO write access to an invalid page. Prevent the integer underflow by changing the type of related variables. Signed-off-by: Kyungwook Boo <bookyungwook@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ffc91764-1142-4ba2-91b6-8c773f6f7095@gmail.com/T/ Reviewed-by: Przemek Kitszel <przemyslaw.kitszel@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Aleksandr Loktionov <aleksandr.loktionov@intel.com> Tested-by: Rinitha S <sx.rinitha@intel.com> (A Contingent worker at Intel) Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com> (cherry picked from commit 015bac5) Signed-off-by: Brett Mastbergen <bmastbergen@ciq.com>
jira VULN-80684 cve CVE-2025-38461 commit-author Michal Luczaj <mhal@rbox.co> commit 687aa0c Transport assignment may race with module unload. Protect new_transport from becoming a stale pointer. This also takes care of an insecure call in vsock_use_local_transport(); add a lockdep assert. BUG: unable to handle page fault for address: fffffbfff8056000 Oops: Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP KASAN RIP: 0010:vsock_assign_transport+0x366/0x600 Call Trace: vsock_connect+0x59c/0xc40 __sys_connect+0xe8/0x100 __x64_sys_connect+0x6e/0xc0 do_syscall_64+0x92/0x1c0 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x4b/0x53 Fixes: c0cfa2d ("vsock: add multi-transports support") Reviewed-by: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Michal Luczaj <mhal@rbox.co> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250703-vsock-transports-toctou-v4-2-98f0eb530747@rbox.co Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> (cherry picked from commit 687aa0c) Signed-off-by: Brett Mastbergen <bmastbergen@ciq.com>
jira VULN-89209 cve CVE-2025-38472 commit-author Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> commit 2d72afb A crash in conntrack was reported while trying to unlink the conntrack entry from the hash bucket list: [exception RIP: __nf_ct_delete_from_lists+172] [..] #7 [ff539b5a2b043aa0] nf_ct_delete at ffffffffc124d421 [nf_conntrack] #8 [ff539b5a2b043ad0] nf_ct_gc_expired at ffffffffc124d999 [nf_conntrack] #9 [ff539b5a2b043ae0] __nf_conntrack_find_get at ffffffffc124efbc [nf_conntrack] [..] The nf_conn struct is marked as allocated from slab but appears to be in a partially initialised state: ct hlist pointer is garbage; looks like the ct hash value (hence crash). ct->status is equal to IPS_CONFIRMED|IPS_DYING, which is expected ct->timeout is 30000 (=30s), which is unexpected. Everything else looks like normal udp conntrack entry. If we ignore ct->status and pretend its 0, the entry matches those that are newly allocated but not yet inserted into the hash: - ct hlist pointers are overloaded and store/cache the raw tuple hash - ct->timeout matches the relative time expected for a new udp flow rather than the absolute 'jiffies' value. If it were not for the presence of IPS_CONFIRMED, __nf_conntrack_find_get() would have skipped the entry. Theory is that we did hit following race: cpu x cpu y cpu z found entry E found entry E E is expired <preemption> nf_ct_delete() return E to rcu slab init_conntrack E is re-inited, ct->status set to 0 reply tuplehash hnnode.pprev stores hash value. cpu y found E right before it was deleted on cpu x. E is now re-inited on cpu z. cpu y was preempted before checking for expiry and/or confirm bit. ->refcnt set to 1 E now owned by skb ->timeout set to 30000 If cpu y were to resume now, it would observe E as expired but would skip E due to missing CONFIRMED bit. nf_conntrack_confirm gets called sets: ct->status |= CONFIRMED This is wrong: E is not yet added to hashtable. cpu y resumes, it observes E as expired but CONFIRMED: <resumes> nf_ct_expired() -> yes (ct->timeout is 30s) confirmed bit set. cpu y will try to delete E from the hashtable: nf_ct_delete() -> set DYING bit __nf_ct_delete_from_lists Even this scenario doesn't guarantee a crash: cpu z still holds the table bucket lock(s) so y blocks: wait for spinlock held by z CONFIRMED is set but there is no guarantee ct will be added to hash: "chaintoolong" or "clash resolution" logic both skip the insert step. reply hnnode.pprev still stores the hash value. unlocks spinlock return NF_DROP <unblocks, then crashes on hlist_nulls_del_rcu pprev> In case CPU z does insert the entry into the hashtable, cpu y will unlink E again right away but no crash occurs. Without 'cpu y' race, 'garbage' hlist is of no consequence: ct refcnt remains at 1, eventually skb will be free'd and E gets destroyed via: nf_conntrack_put -> nf_conntrack_destroy -> nf_ct_destroy. To resolve this, move the IPS_CONFIRMED assignment after the table insertion but before the unlock. Pablo points out that the confirm-bit-store could be reordered to happen before hlist add resp. the timeout fixup, so switch to set_bit and before_atomic memory barrier to prevent this. It doesn't matter if other CPUs can observe a newly inserted entry right before the CONFIRMED bit was set: Such event cannot be distinguished from above "E is the old incarnation" case: the entry will be skipped. Also change nf_ct_should_gc() to first check the confirmed bit. The gc sequence is: 1. Check if entry has expired, if not skip to next entry 2. Obtain a reference to the expired entry. 3. Call nf_ct_should_gc() to double-check step 1. nf_ct_should_gc() is thus called only for entries that already failed an expiry check. After this patch, once the confirmed bit check passes ct->timeout has been altered to reflect the absolute 'best before' date instead of a relative time. Step 3 will therefore not remove the entry. Without this change to nf_ct_should_gc() we could still get this sequence: 1. Check if entry has expired. 2. Obtain a reference. 3. Call nf_ct_should_gc() to double-check step 1: 4 - entry is still observed as expired 5 - meanwhile, ct->timeout is corrected to absolute value on other CPU and confirm bit gets set 6 - confirm bit is seen 7 - valid entry is removed again First do check 6), then 4) so the gc expiry check always picks up either confirmed bit unset (entry gets skipped) or expiry re-check failure for re-inited conntrack objects. This change cannot be backported to releases before 5.19. Without commit 8a75a2c ("netfilter: conntrack: remove unconfirmed list") |= IPS_CONFIRMED line cannot be moved without further changes. Cc: Razvan Cojocaru <rzvncj@gmail.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netfilter-devel/20250627142758.25664-1-fw@strlen.de/ Link: https://lore.kernel.org/netfilter-devel/4239da15-83ff-4ca4-939d-faef283471bb@gmail.com/ Fixes: 1397af5 ("netfilter: conntrack: remove the percpu dying list") Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de> Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org> (cherry picked from commit 2d72afb) Signed-off-by: Brett Mastbergen <bmastbergen@ciq.com>
jira VULN-98609 cve CVE-2025-38498 commit-author Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> commit 12f147d Ensure that propagation settings can only be changed for mounts located in the caller's mount namespace. This change aligns permission checking with the rest of mount(2). Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Fixes: 07b2088 ("beginning of the shared-subtree proper") Reported-by: "Orlando, Noah" <Noah.Orlando@deshaw.com> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> (cherry picked from commit 12f147d) Signed-off-by: Brett Mastbergen <bmastbergen@ciq.com>
jira VULN-98609 cve-bf CVE-2025-38498 commit-author Pavel Tikhomirov <ptikhomirov@virtuozzo.com> commit 9ffb14e Previously a sharing group (shared and master ids pair) can be only inherited when mount is created via bindmount. This patch adds an ability to add an existing private mount into an existing sharing group. With this functionality one can first create the desired mount tree from only private mounts (without the need to care about undesired mount propagation or mount creation order implied by sharing group dependencies), and next then setup any desired mount sharing between those mounts in tree as needed. This allows CRIU to restore any set of mount namespaces, mount trees and sharing group trees for a container. We have many issues with restoring mounts in CRIU related to sharing groups and propagation: - reverse sharing groups vs mount tree order requires complex mounts reordering which mostly implies also using some temporary mounts (please see https://lkml.org/lkml/2021/3/23/569 for more info) - mount() syscall creates tons of mounts due to propagation - mount re-parenting due to propagation - "Mount Trap" due to propagation - "Non Uniform" propagation, meaning that with different tricks with mount order and temporary children-"lock" mounts one can create mount trees which can't be restored without those tricks (see https://www.linuxplumbersconf.org/event/7/contributions/640/) With this new functionality we can resolve all the problems with propagation at once. Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210715100714.120228-1-ptikhomirov@virtuozzo.com Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com> Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> Cc: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com> Cc: Mattias Nissler <mnissler@chromium.org> Cc: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com> Cc: Andrei Vagin <avagin@gmail.com> Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-api@vger.kernel.org Cc: lkml <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> Co-developed-by: Andrei Vagin <avagin@gmail.com> Acked-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com> Signed-off-by: Pavel Tikhomirov <ptikhomirov@virtuozzo.com> Signed-off-by: Andrei Vagin <avagin@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@ubuntu.com> (cherry picked from commit 9ffb14e) Signed-off-by: Brett Mastbergen <bmastbergen@ciq.com>
jira VULN-98609 cve-bf CVE-2025-38498 commit-author Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> commit cffd044 do_change_type() and do_set_group() are operating on different aspects of the same thing - propagation graph. The latter asks for mounts involved to be mounted in namespace(s) the caller has CAP_SYS_ADMIN for. The former is a mess - originally it didn't even check that mount *is* mounted. That got fixed, but the resulting check turns out to be too strict for userland - in effect, we check that mount is in our namespace, having already checked that we have CAP_SYS_ADMIN there. What we really need (in both cases) is * only touch mounts that are mounted. That's a must-have constraint - data corruption happens if it get violated. * don't allow to mess with a namespace unless you already have enough permissions to do so (i.e. CAP_SYS_ADMIN in its userns). That's an equivalent of what do_set_group() does; let's extract that into a helper (may_change_propagation()) and use it in both do_set_group() and do_change_type(). Fixes: 12f147d "do_change_type(): refuse to operate on unmounted/not ours mounts" Acked-by: Andrei Vagin <avagin@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Pavel Tikhomirov <ptikhomirov@virtuozzo.com> Tested-by: Pavel Tikhomirov <ptikhomirov@virtuozzo.com> Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> (cherry picked from commit cffd044) Signed-off-by: Brett Mastbergen <bmastbergen@ciq.com>
jira VULN-98609 cve-bf CVE-2025-38498 commit-author Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> commit d8cc036 9ffb14e "move_mount: allow to add a mount into an existing group" breaks assertions on ->mnt_share/->mnt_slave. For once, the data structures in question are actually documented. Documentation/filesystem/sharedsubtree.rst: All vfsmounts in a peer group have the same ->mnt_master. If it is non-NULL, they form a contiguous (ordered) segment of slave list. do_set_group() puts a mount into the same place in propagation graph as the old one. As the result, if old mount gets events from somewhere and is not a pure event sink, new one needs to be placed next to the old one in the slave list the old one's on. If it is a pure event sink, we only need to make sure the new one doesn't end up in the middle of some peer group. "move_mount: allow to add a mount into an existing group" ends up putting the new one in the beginning of list; that's definitely not going to be in the middle of anything, so that's fine for case when old is not marked shared. In case when old one _is_ marked shared (i.e. is not a pure event sink), that breaks the assumptions of propagation graph iterators. Put the new mount next to the old one on the list - that does the right thing in "old is marked shared" case and is just as correct as the current behaviour if old is not marked shared (kudos to Pavel for pointing that out - my original suggested fix changed behaviour in the "nor marked" case, which complicated things for no good reason). Reviewed-by: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org> Fixes: 9ffb14e ("move_mount: allow to add a mount into an existing group") Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> (cherry picked from commit d8cc036) Signed-off-by: Brett Mastbergen <bmastbergen@ciq.com>
kerneltoast
approved these changes
Oct 16, 2025
Collaborator
kerneltoast
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Interdiff reports no differences 🚢
PlaidCat
approved these changes
Oct 16, 2025
Collaborator
PlaidCat
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
![]()
shreeya-patel98
approved these changes
Oct 17, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Background
8fc8c2576054 do_change_type(): refuse to operate on unmounted/not ours mountswas backported to address CVE-2025-38498. There is an upstream bugfix for that inf28687afdef1 use uniform permission checks for all mount propagation changes, which has a prerequisite commit ind6f47bcb34a5 move_mount: allow to add a mount into an existing groupand has its own upstream bugfix in79b417103d1f fix propagation graph breakage by MOVE_MOUNT_SET_GROUP move_mount(2). Since none of the bugfixes (or bf prereqs) have CVE of their own, I've marked them all as cve-bf for CVE-2025-38498.Besides that, everything stands alone.
All clean cherry-picks.
Commits
Build Log
Testing
selftest-5.14.0-284.30.1.el9_2.92ciq_lts.12.1.x86_64-1.log
selftest-5.14.0-bmastbergen_ciqlts9_2_many-vulns-10-15-2025-79b417103+-1.log