Skip to content

Conversation

@sgrekhov
Copy link
Contributor

@sgrekhov sgrekhov commented Dec 9, 2025

No description provided.

@sgrekhov sgrekhov requested a review from eernstg December 9, 2025 09:14
Copy link
Member

@eernstg eernstg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good, but the descriptions need to say 'type annotation'.

/// the augmented function.
///
/// @description Checks that it is not an error if an augmentation uses a
/// parameter name with a library prefix.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't understand that, and I can't see anything which could be called "a parameter name with a library prefix"...

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ah! It's the type annotation of the parameter which has an import prefix. So the description should be adjusted to say that.

/// getter, or setter may be augmented to provide a body or add metadata.
///
/// @description Checks that it is not an error if an augmentation uses a
/// parameter name with a library prefix.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Ditto.

@sgrekhov sgrekhov changed the title #3182. Add tests for library prefix #3182. Add tests for augmenting function parameters with import prefix Dec 10, 2025
@sgrekhov
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks! Updated. PTAL

@sgrekhov sgrekhov requested a review from eernstg December 10, 2025 08:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants