Better formatting for long type parameter bounds. #1576
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The tall style was already doing a better job on #1568 than the old short style does. (I don't know why it leaves an overly long line there. It seems like a bug but perhaps a nasty subtle one in the solver.) But it still didn't allow splitting before `extends` in a bound which could leave long lines in cases where the type parameter and bound name are both quite long. Rare, but we may as well do a better job. So this introduces a new piece that allows splitting before `extends` if needed. Fix #1568.
kallentu
approved these changes
Oct 8, 2024
natebosch
approved these changes
Oct 8, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The tall style was already doing a better job on #1568 than the old short style does. (I don't know why it leaves an overly long line there. It seems like a bug but perhaps a nasty subtle one in the solver.)
But it still didn't allow splitting before
extendsin a bound which could leave long lines in cases where the type parameter and bound name are both quite long. Rare, but we may as well do a better job.So this introduces a new piece that allows splitting before
extendsif needed.Fix #1568.
cc @stereotype441 Take a look at the regression test if you want to see how the new style handles your example.