feat: impl WarehouseOptions for Private Task

[KKould]

I hereby agree to the terms of the CLA available at: https://docs.databend.com/dev/policies/cla/

Summary

Private Task supports WarehouseOptions for resource control(via cluster_id)

CREATE TASK my_task_1 WAREHOUSE = 'wh1' SCHEDULE = 3 SECOND AS insert into t1 values(1)

Tests

• Unit Test
• Logic Test
• Benchmark Test
• No Test - test-private-task-warehouse.sh (manually test the script)

Type of change

• Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New Feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking Change (fix or feature that could cause existing functionality not to work as expected)
• Documentation Update
• Refactoring
• Performance Improvement
• Other (please describe):

---

This change is 

[drmingdrmer]

Reviewed 11 of 11 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @sundy-li and @zhang2014)

---

src/meta/proto-conv/tests/it/v139_task_message.rs line 26 at r1 (raw file):

#[test]
fn test_decode_v139_task_message() -> anyhow::Result<()> {

I found that FromToProto for TaskMessage is not tested in the version it is introduced.

Are you sure this TaskMessage can load the previous version TaskMessage::Delete(String) with TaskMessage::Delete(DeleteTask)?

Maybe you should fire another PR to add the backward compatibility test for the previous version of TaskMessage::Delete before merge this PR.

[drmingdrmer]

Reviewed 3 of 6 files at r2, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: 9 of 12 files reviewed, 2 unresolved discussions (waiting on @KKould, @sundy-li, and @zhang2014)

---

src/meta/proto-conv/src/task_from_to_protobuf_impl.rs line 159 at r2 (raw file):

                    mt::TaskMessage::ScheduleTask(mt::Task::from_pb(task)?)
                }
                Message::DeleteTask(task_name) => mt::TaskMessage::DeleteTask(task_name, None),

This should be without None and keep the same as previous structure to provide compatibility.

[drmingdrmer]

Reviewed 3 of 6 files at r2.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @sundy-li and @zhang2014)