Skip to content

Conversation

@dbshah12
Copy link

@dbshah12 dbshah12 commented Jul 22, 2025

Description

  • Setting JAVA_HOME to JDK 17 for virtualization instead of JDK 8 to enable compatibility with the JDK 17 upgrade in app-gate.
  • Installing open jdk 17 for windows connector pkg to enable compatibility with the JDK 17 upgrade in app-gate.

Testing

We have been running ab-pre-push twice a week and running regression builds with the images.
Sample ex: https://selfservice-jenkins.eng-tools-prd.aws.delphixcloud.com/job/appliance-build-orchestrator-pre-push/12760/

@dbshah12 dbshah12 force-pushed the dlpx/pr/dbshah12/3363660d-78cd-4c3c-acdb-c77675bcc565 branch from 63a7f15 to d567e72 Compare July 22, 2025 06:35
@dbshah12 dbshah12 force-pushed the dlpx/pr/dbshah12/3363660d-78cd-4c3c-acdb-c77675bcc565 branch 4 times, most recently from ee026d2 to 95a3d1c Compare September 5, 2025 13:30
@dbshah12 dbshah12 force-pushed the dlpx/pr/dbshah12/3363660d-78cd-4c3c-acdb-c77675bcc565 branch from 95a3d1c to c1c825d Compare October 30, 2025 14:13
@dbshah12 dbshah12 force-pushed the dlpx/pr/dbshah12/3363660d-78cd-4c3c-acdb-c77675bcc565 branch from c1c825d to e08f45c Compare October 30, 2025 14:14
@amit-hubale amit-hubale force-pushed the dlpx/pr/dbshah12/3363660d-78cd-4c3c-acdb-c77675bcc565 branch from b06da49 to 980b082 Compare December 8, 2025 11:21
@VenkatanadhanG VenkatanadhanG changed the title DLPX-94716 Updated JAVA_HOME to use java 17 DLPX-94716 [Appliance] - Updated JAVA_HOME to use java 17 Dec 16, 2025
@VenkatanadhanG VenkatanadhanG changed the title DLPX-94716 [Appliance] - Updated JAVA_HOME to use java 17 DLPX-94716 [Appliance] - Support for upgrading to jdk17 in virtualization Dec 16, 2025
@VenkatanadhanG VenkatanadhanG changed the title DLPX-94716 [Appliance] - Support for upgrading to jdk17 in virtualization DLPX-96190 [Appliance] - linux-pkg to use jdk17 for virtualization builds and windows-connector Dec 17, 2025
@VenkatanadhanG VenkatanadhanG marked this pull request as ready for review December 17, 2025 05:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants