-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.7k
use standard TARGETARCH for architecture suffix #13496
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Nicolas De Loof <nicolas.deloof@gmail.com>
| # TODO: should just use standard arch | ||
| TARGETARCH=$([ "$TARGETARCH" = "amd64" ] && echo "x86_64" || echo "$TARGETARCH"); \ | ||
| TARGETARCH=$([ "$TARGETARCH" = "arm64" ] && echo "aarch64" || echo "$TARGETARCH"); \ | ||
| cp docker-compose* "/out/docker-compose-${TARGETOS}-${TARGETARCH}${TARGETVARIANT}$(ls docker-compose* | sed -e 's/^docker-compose//')" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This will probably need an update to the official docker image as well; it looks like it currently downloads binaries from GitHub; https://github.com/docker-library/docker/blob/d9bae6519a1b0a9c73fab9a859e0c5c5131b0176/29/cli/Dockerfile#L110-L140
Wondering if we should (to help transitioning) keep both variants for some time.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
we could, but this won't help us detect the places to require an update, as consumer won't notice the breaking change
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Agreed, it's better to just rip the bandaid off than double the storage in the hopes that somebody proactively notices, but I do appreciate the thought. 🫶
(If releases could have symlinks in their artifacts, perhaps I would feel differently, but they can't - eventually the bandaid has to come off and it might as well be sooner instead of later.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, that's reasonable; perhaps we should create a ticket and pin it on this repository for users that arrive here after they get a "not found" error.
(We still have a similar discussion to have for the static downloads from https://download.docker.com/mac/static/stable/, although I guess for those we could have a symlink / redirect)
I mostly was considering that this change may go out in a minor or patch release; if it's a patch release, then users may pay less attention to release notes. I guess it would've been great to make the change with the v5 major version update, but hindsight is a B.
We should also check if there's references to these in our docs; looks like there's at least one in this section; https://docs.docker.com/compose/install/linux/#install-the-plugin-manually
thaJeztah
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
change itself LGTM though!
What I did
use standard
TARGETARCHfor architecture suffix in released binariesthis enforces consistency with other Docker CLI plugins (buildx, buildx, scout, init ...)
note: this is a breaking change which may impact scripts downloading latest release. Anyway, this TODO is here for too long, better introduce a breaking change once and get a consistent user experience across docker repositories
Related issue
(not mandatory) A picture of a cute animal, if possible in relation to what you did