Skip to content

Conversation

guardrex
Copy link
Collaborator

@guardrex guardrex commented Oct 16, 2025

Addresses #36223

Ilona ... Two things ......

  • See my small code changes ... see if they make sense or if I should revert them back to your suggested code.

  • Let's do this in two steps (this is an "addresses" PR) because I'm waiting on @danroth27 to review Split the Routing & Navigation article (dotnet/AspNetCore.Docs #36145). That PR is a BeAsT 👹 with a lot of content moving around, so let's only work the release notes side on this PR. I'll open a new PR after 36145 merges to close out your issue.

I learnt how to open issues properly!

Thx! That speeds us UP. 🏃‍♂️Now, if I could just learn how to write software properly! 🙈😆

@guardrex guardrex self-assigned this Oct 16, 2025
@guardrex guardrex requested a review from Copilot October 16, 2025 11:50
Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR enhances the ASP.NET Core 10 release notes for Blazor by clarifying how apps without Blazor’s router can handle Not Found responses and adjusts the illustrative code snippet accordingly.

  • Clarifies two supported approaches (StatusCodePages re-execution and router event handling) for rendering Not Found pages.
  • Refines language and simplifies the sample by replacing reflection with a helper method to produce the Not Found path.

Co-authored-by: Copilot <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
@guardrex
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@ilonatommy ... How about this (last commit)?

Clarify the precedence of Not Found path handling in Blazor.
@guardrex
Copy link
Collaborator Author

guardrex commented Oct 17, 2025

Just a couple of tiny NITs that I updated on the last commit ...

  • We mostly use "app" for "application."
  • We generally avoid future tense.
  • I've been making "Not Found" a proper adjective. I'm testing the language out to see how it composes. We may change it later.

@guardrex guardrex merged commit d25d66b into main Oct 17, 2025
3 checks passed
@guardrex guardrex deleted the guardrex-patch-2 branch October 17, 2025 07:44
@guardrex
Copy link
Collaborator Author

guardrex commented Oct 17, 2025

Ok, cool. 👍

I'll circle back around to the article updates right after we get the Routing and Nav article split on #36145.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants