-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 25.6k
Reject mappings that (eventually) set dimension and metric in the same field #138308
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
gmarouli
merged 2 commits into
elastic:main
from
gmarouli:fix-mapping-validation-for-dimension-metric-conflict
Nov 20, 2025
Merged
Reject mappings that (eventually) set dimension and metric in the same field #138308
gmarouli
merged 2 commits into
elastic:main
from
gmarouli:fix-mapping-validation-for-dimension-metric-conflict
Nov 20, 2025
+32
−0
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Collaborator
|
Pinging @elastic/es-storage-engine (Team:StorageEngine) |
Collaborator
|
Hi @gmarouli, I've created a changelog YAML for you. |
kkrik-es
reviewed
Nov 19, 2025
server/src/main/java/org/elasticsearch/index/mapper/NumberFieldMapper.java
Show resolved
Hide resolved
kkrik-es
approved these changes
Nov 19, 2025
Contributor
kkrik-es
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Nice, that was quick.
gmarouli
added a commit
to gmarouli/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 20, 2025
gmarouli
added a commit
to gmarouli/elasticsearch
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 20, 2025
Collaborator
elasticsearchmachine
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 20, 2025
elasticsearchmachine
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 20, 2025
elasticsearchmachine
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 20, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
auto-backport
Automatically create backport pull requests when merged
>bug
:StorageEngine/Mapping
The storage related side of mappings
Team:StorageEngine
v8.19.8
v9.1.8
v9.2.2
v9.3.0
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
In this PR we add a check that will reject the following mapping:
This mapping was rejected when assertions were enabled, but on production environments it was not checked properly.
The problem is that we were checking that a field cannot be both a dimension and a metric during parsing. When the mapping is first parsed the
attributes.kube_job_status_activedoes not explicitly list"time_series_dimension": trueso it passes the check, then during building the mappers we do add it but we do not recheck it then.Now we check this when we build a
NumberFieldMapper.Fixes: #138044